In terms of what features and size you go with, I think it depends on if you want to keep the PURE X around. If you're planning on it, then a product stack that looks like this makes sense:
As long as the PURE X exists I don't think the extra volume to support both a UHP and a LP GPU simultaneously is worth it. If you're planning to simplify your lineup then yeah, consolidate the PURE and the PURE X. But otherwise giving folks more options in a similar size on the PURE Mk2 is the way to go.
- PURE: Either a UHP or a LP GPU and external PSU (so basically either an APU case or a mini S4M)
- PURE X: LP GPU and UHP/Flex ATX
- PURE XL: Full-height ITX GPU, SFX PSU
People generally are also wary of Picopsu as well. Even if they offer similar capabilities, people feel more comfortable using an off the shelf PSU from brands they're familiar or see often.
The UHP power supply requires you to use screw terminals, and I would say 95% of people are not comfortable with that.
So even if given similar capabilities most would not use UHP. Which I guess also further the argument to not support it. The nice thing is UHP is very cost effective. There is a nice 200w GAN unit that I'll be testing and possibly fielding, but that is expected to be $100 just for the brick compared to $60 UHP.
For external, it ends up leaving us with only two choices: Minibox or the HDPLEX. External psu unit has taken a nosedive and fewer and fewer people are going for them.
Last edited: