I don't feel like this applies here, the front panel was not revealed until quite late on, and the feedback to it happened immediately.It wasn't for months, but it's overnight, so they feel like delaying release dates over and over
I don't feel like this applies here, the front panel was not revealed until quite late on, and the feedback to it happened immediately.It wasn't for months, but it's overnight, so they feel like delaying release dates over and over
The case identity has been about the front panel and duo tone from day one so I'd say a lot.I’m for just the plain slab of aluminum as the guys above me mentioned or the straight milled line as an homage to the OG design. I guess the question that needs to be answered is how much of the case identity was tied to the front panel. I personally don’t think it really matters at all what the front panel is, since for me the identity was always in the layout. I think lower price and better availability should be the main points everyone focuses on.
I'm an EU customer. I paid 245 dollar to get it here and another 50 euro in taxes for the original Formd T1.I have to agree.
Honestly, after several months of waiting, having to wait for another 1-2 months is just discouraging.
As an EU customer, it sets a precedent that puts me in an unpleasant situation. If I don't want to pay 300€ for this case (something I won't) I have to wait until May, but with 0 guarantee of more delays due to last-minute changes because of opinionated sayings on the internet about non-existing issues. Not to mention unexpected cost increases.
[/I].
That's right, if the hallmark were exclusively "the layout", then there are a lot of different T1s on the market, as all these cases use the same layout.The case identity has been about the front panel and duo tone from day one so I'd say a lot.
The sandwich style layout is not unique to the T1.
The T1 is also exploring new layouts with the tower and reference design, so you can't really call that an identity when going with at least 3 layout styles.
The lower price would be nice, but not at the cost of quality. I have to look at the case daily and want it looking good and like a Formd case.
Also even with the price increase the reference case is not more expensive.
Good availability of any case in these trying times is idle hope imo.
Some people are willing to pay for quality materials and great design.... not any different than cars, homes, boats, audio, etc., etc., etc....The amount of people who wish to part with more money is baffling.
Actually $22 is a significant amount of money for lots of people, myself included. Let’s not gatekeep people who don’t have unlimited disposable income.If 175+22 is to much, the original case was also to expensive for you and you should look into other cases.
So? the manufacturer should absorb costs?... don't get your pointActually $22 is a significant amount of money for lots of people, myself included. Let’s not gatekeep people who don’t have unlimited disposable income.
I always felt the identity was in the design but not the front panel for me as I went single color and it could have been a single slab. But I can see that people that wanted two tone really wanted two tone since that option was presented from the beginning. What set this case apart for me was the movable spine, box design as opposed to the roundedness of the ghost, the mesh sides, premium material and all of that I see moving over to v2, though I'm going reference this time. Mostly though whatever wahaha360 works on I feel is tied to the identity. I'd rather he make something he likes. But if we ever forget, T1 is carved into the back so I suppose if that's on a case, that means it's a T1.I’m for just the plain slab of aluminum as the guys above me mentioned or the straight milled line as an homage to the OG design. I guess the question that needs to be answered is how much of the case identity was tied to the front panel. I personally don’t think it really matters at all what the front panel is, since for me the identity was always in the layout. I think lower price and better availability should be the main points everyone focuses on.
$22 is the supposed additional cost for the 2 tone front panel, which is the entire subject of the discussion right now. Other guy says if you don’t want to pay the $22 and would prefer an alternative panel for lower cost you shouldn’t be looking at this case. My point is that I disagree with that and I think it’s perfectly reasonable to prefer a lower cost alternative configuration for the case.So? the manufacturer should absorb costs?... don't get your point
I think you mean me. I am not gatekeeping just stating facts. And my reply was towards a EU customer that is unwilling to pay close to 300 euro for the case.$22 is the supposed additional cost for the 2 tone front panel, which is the entire subject of the discussion right now. Other guy says if you don’t want to pay the $22 and would prefer an alternative panel for lower cost you shouldn’t be looking at this case. My point is that I disagree with that and I think it’s perfectly reasonable to prefer a lower cost alternative configuration for the case.
The problem is that some people are effectively bumping the price for everyone. Not to mention that looks are subjective; one's great design is another's ugly hack.Some people are willing to pay for quality materials and great design.... not any different than cars, homes, boats, audio, etc., etc., etc....
Wait I think that guy was still talking about a default price increase by making the 2 piece panel the default option. I agree, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to be disappointed with a $22 price increase in the stock config. Telling people to essentially go home because they’re more price conscious is a dick move, period.I think you mean me. I am not gatekeeping just stating facts. And my reply was towards a EU customer that is unwilling to pay close to 300 euro for the case.
With that statement in mind he was talking specifically about the price increase for the duo tone design.
I'm not saying you shouldn't be looking at this case but quality tends to cost money so if you want the duo tone this case still costing less than the original is no reason to complain.
And with other options you state the case will still cost less, so I see no valid point being made.
Edit: not to mention that there's no extra cost for a pcie4.0 cable I had to buy seperately.
Guys..... We are talking about increasing the price 10%.The problem is that some people are effectively bumping the price for everyone. Not to mention that looks are subjective; one's great design is another's ugly hack.
Sounds like something a first-worlder would say. ;PGuys..... We are talking about increasing the price 10%.
I may be the odd one out here, but I'm interested in this case exactly because of its layout (and mesh panels). But, perhaps, you know of some other, cheaper case(s) that can fit the NH-C14S and a reference-sized graphics card, while being under 10L in volume?This is a desig (even luxury) product. It is a given that if you are interested in this case it is for the design, the optimization, everything. Not just the layout. If it was just that, you would opt for much cheaper options on the market.
Citation needed...The T1 was successful, not because of the layout, but because of its incredible design.