I think an extra centimeter or so could be achieved with 180-degree adapters.That GPU height kills me though; my GPU is too tall... single slot GPU + CPU loop with a 280mm would be so spicy...
I think an extra centimeter or so could be achieved with 180-degree adapters.That GPU height kills me though; my GPU is too tall... single slot GPU + CPU loop with a 280mm would be so spicy...
Thanks for the answer!The G1/4 port is still there in the T1 Sandwich, but there isnt enough room at the back of the case for it on the Reference model. This is going off of the renders we've been given.
W360 has said that the TX240 is supported with full sized NF-A12x25 fans, so I'd assume it will fit fine in the V2.
I think his situation also refers to the terminals of the waterblock adding to the height.I think an extra centimeter or so could be achieved with 180-degree adapters.
Having zero experience with custom loops until T1 v1.1, I'm curious what makes you say that Huda. I know you've done a ton of loop builds and tinkered with that mod to enable a side mounted 280 in v1.1-- did you ever get to fill and run that? Or is it just a matter of keeping the physics of the larger rad and simpler, single rad airflow path in mindYou could run your current components with a 280mm Rad instead with the reference layout ... if you have a GPU that fits, it is the superior configuration for both air and water cooling.
*smacking forearms*Who else is checking the forums an unhealthy amount just in case a drop date has been posted?
These look so friken awesome!!! cant wait to get one2021-10-19: Product ready, website and packaging not so much. Will keep stock piling so it doesn't sell out immediately and enrage the internet.
Highlights:
- Aluminum Mesh Panels SHOCKINGLY good compare to the older Steel Mesh, even surprising for us.
- T1-Reference with Noctua C14S on AMD 5950X runs nice with FE3080.
- MSI Suprim X just not for SFF, no performance benefit over ROG, much longer, why MSI! why!
- HWL 280GTS is a really tight fit in both T1-Reference and T1-Sandwich, recommended only for nutters.
One of these is the older steel mesh, the other new aluminum mesh! Unibody + CNCed Aluminum Mesh Panels 1) began as joke and 2) used as a torture test for manufacturing, but now it's no longer a prototype, and it's shockingly good.
After we launch T1 V2, we are going to test Transparent Aluminum
I like this ideaNot this year, 2022Q2 yes.
I'm thinking about offering a raw version, so people can paint themselves if in a hurry.
Having zero experience with custom loops until T1 v1.1, I'm curious what makes you say that Huda. I know you've done a ton of loop builds and tinkered with that mod to enable a side mounted 280 in v1.1-- did you ever get to fill and run that? Or is it just a matter of keeping the physics of the larger rad and simpler, single rad airflow path in mind
I'm curious because if 1x 280 GTS will perform even comparably to 2xTX240 then I would definitely lean toward the single 280
100% agreed on the solid theorycrafting 1x rad vs. 2x rad and 280 rad surface area versus 240s!.. The reason I decided not to pursue it is the top radiator would use most preheated air that has passed through the side radiator. ...
...a dual setup being marginally better with much more headache, it seems like a single 280mm with ... 2 standard fans should yield a 50% increase (more rad surface area plus a standard fan replacing a slim). And then of course you have the simplicity of a single rad...
This is the wayDual rad will still siren's call me, but I think my heart is now set on a single 280 rad loop
Thanks to the people that tried to answer my question- the gist of what I got was that the sandwich will be an improved version of the v1.1 with support for a single 280mm rad or up to two slim 240mm rads, right? And the reference layout will exist for the purpose of having air cooled builds with chonky CPU coolers, correct? Finally, no one really elaborated on what the tower layout will be for, but I imagine if I'm going single or dual 240 rads (of which I'll do at least one, since my cardboard box build is already utilizing a TX240) then probably sandwich layout would be optimal for thermals?I've been keeping up with this thread pretty regularly, and been patiently waiting for v2.0. I was wondering with regards to tower vs reference vs sandwich though... what are the pros/cons of each? I know traditionally in SFF builds, sandwich has allowed for greater utilization of the interior space. The reason I'm asking is because with v1.1 sandwich was the only option and it made it easy, but I'd like to know the tradeoffs when choosing a version of the v2.0.
I currently have a 5900X, RTX 3080FE, and both are being cooled by a TX240 rad with dual NF-A12x25 Noctuas, using a DC-LT 40 and DC-LT 2 pump/mini-res. Earlier on in the thread I heard talk about the v2.0 maybe supporting a second TX240- is that still likely to be the case?
TLDR: Hoping to get some clarification on what the different config options will be for tower vs reference vs sandwich layout.
Thanks to the people that tried to answer my question- the gist of what I got was that the sandwich will be an improved version of the v1.1 with support for a single 280mm rad or up to two slim 240mm rads, right? And the reference layout will exist for the purpose of having air cooled builds with chonky CPU coolers, correct? Finally, no one really elaborated on what the tower layout will be for, but I imagine if I'm going single or dual 240 rads (of which I'll do at least one, since my cardboard box build is already utilizing a TX240) then probably sandwich layout would be optimal for thermals?
Indeed, which is what I'll be running. As mentioned in my original question, I'm currently running a full loop with a 5900X, RTX 3080FE, and the TX240- it's just been running in a cardboard box for over a year I was one of the people who had their white v1.1 cancelled.In sandwich mode that's only possible with single slot GPUs. The single 280mm radiator would be possible in reference layout as well, albeit only with 3080/ti FE models.
The moral of the story is, 3080/ti FE opens up more options for water cooling or air cooling.
That is possible, just very hard to do, and you need a 1 slot GPU with I'm assuming side mounted fittings, because there will be no room to run the tubing otherwise is my guess.Is a 280 + 240 dual rad setup not possible? 280 on the side, 240 on top in the usual sandwich layout spot
1x 280 on the side, and 1x 240 on the top is the officially supported config, but if you want to use dual 240 rads I think you might have to use 140mm to 120mm adapters, not sure if the bracket will only support 280 rads or 280 and 240 rads.Thanks to the people that tried to answer my question- the gist of what I got was that the sandwich will be an improved version of the v1.1 with support for a single 280mm rad or up to two slim 240mm rads, right? And the reference layout will exist for the purpose of having air cooled builds with chonky CPU coolers, correct? Finally, no one really elaborated on what the tower layout will be for, but I imagine if I'm going single or dual 240 rads (of which I'll do at least one, since my cardboard box build is already utilizing a TX240) then probably sandwich layout would be optimal for thermals?
Yep, doubt that will fit. On v1.1 the clearance is 50mm in 3 slot mode. In v2.0 it's just a few mm wider, so not enough.With the new EK AIOs releasing - will the 61,9 mm Pump hight be an issue with 3 Slot Sandwich Mode ?