Completed DeskNano x300 - a 1.2L replacement for the DeskMini a300/x300
- Thread starter msystems
- Start date
Sorry if this is a dumb question, but is it as easy as taking the stl files to a maker space, uploading them into the printer and pressing “go”? I finally have a reason to print something cool so I’m interested in learning, but I’m very clueless with this stuff…
Just no room anywhere for the ASRock usb connector, except on the lids for 47mm+ coolers. I experimented making one for the axp-47, but the traditional "Motherboard USB-2.0 to Dual USB-A Female" dongle thing is still too large to work. What does fit is getting two "USB-A Female to DIP" Pcbs, which are very small, and soldering these to a pigtail with the USB-2.0 Header, to create a very small adapter. Since these are really small, they can fit into a cutout on the lid. But this is just a mockup for the idea, and its not published or tested.
The files aren't "sliced", so you have to do that part yourself. But pretty much all the parts except the central core are easy to print. The core is about a 10 hour print with .4mm nozzle and .2mm layer with a lot of fine details and bridging. The most common print failure on this piece for me was partial failures on the vertical "towers" by the VRM ventilation breaking, but other than that area had basically no print failures. Then you need m3 screws and to solder a short 16mm switch to the power cable, which i'm sure someone at the maker space would be able to help with. There is a link to the recommended switch in the guide.
Last edited:
Beautiful! Thank you!Just no room anywhere for the ASRock usb connector, except on the lids for 47mm+ coolers. I experimented making one for the axp-47, but the traditional "Motherboard USB-2.0 to Dual USB-A Female" dongle thing is still too large to work. What does fit is getting two "USB-A Female to DIP" Pcbs, which are very small, and soldering these to a pigtail with the USB-2.0 Header, to create a very small adapter. Since these are really small, they can fit into a cutout on the lid. But this is just a mockup for the idea, and its not published or tested.
The files aren't "sliced", so you have to do that part yourself. But pretty much all the parts except the central core are easy to print. The core is about a 10 hour print with .4mm nozzle and .2mm layer with a lot of fine details and bridging. The most common print failure on this piece for me was partial failures on the vertical "towers" by the VRM ventilation breaking, but other than that area had basically no print failures. Then you need m3 screws and to solder a short 16mm switch to the power cable, which i'm sure someone at the maker space would be able to help with. There is a link to the recommended switch in the guide.
Looks like JST PHDR-10VS to me, so basically a 10 pin 2 row JST PHD, but it's better to verify the exact specs (like the pin pitch) with @msystems
One new model added by request - a caddy to add a single standard 7mm thickness SSD to the rear.
Compared to the double 2.5" storage bay, this single SSD version preserves access to the tray screws and unobstructed access to the m.2 slot, as well as being slimmer.
The lower piece is optional, so it doesn't require any disassembly in order to access the m.2 area or to remove the tray. It's also ventilated in both the VRM and m.2 areas.
www.printables.com
Compared to the double 2.5" storage bay, this single SSD version preserves access to the tray screws and unobstructed access to the m.2 slot, as well as being slimmer.
The lower piece is optional, so it doesn't require any disassembly in order to access the m.2 area or to remove the tray. It's also ventilated in both the VRM and m.2 areas.
SSD Caddy for DeskNano x300 by msystems | Download free STL model | Printables.com
Easily add a standard (7mm) SSD to DeskNano, without losing unobstructed access to the rear m.2 or the Tray mounting | Download free 3D printable STL models
www.printables.com
Last edited:
The DeskMini board is just so small that it was causing issues with trying to sandwich taller video cards to the other side.
For this reason I came up with a taller expansion slot module version which elevates the whole case by 5mm, so it should be more compatible with larger cards like the 3080 and MSI Aero series (125mm Height). I've published this on printables.
www.printables.com
I also took a look at prototyping the internal HDPlex version (mounting it under the case when using a dual-slot card), but I don't think it is feasible.
Internal HDPlex concept
1) It can't be done in a space efficient way, so making it internal it just detracts from the overall compactness of the setup.
2) The design would be flimsy and unstable due to the heightened center of gravity. Adding a thicker central spine would then cause the riser to be misaligned, requiring additional versions of the expansion module.
So I have decided to focus development on a new project which will allow much better modularity between power supplies, graphics/storage, and form factors, while still being backward compatible with DeskNano. It will also be more mainstream as I'll be taking the concepts from DeskNano and applying it to the ITX space. I don't plan to design any further modules for this case so this is the end of development.
For this reason I came up with a taller expansion slot module version which elevates the whole case by 5mm, so it should be more compatible with larger cards like the 3080 and MSI Aero series (125mm Height). I've published this on printables.
GPU Adapter for DeskMini and DeskNano x300 by msystems | Download free STL model | Printables.com
1 or 2 Slot versions, various styles | Download free 3D printable STL models
www.printables.com
I also took a look at prototyping the internal HDPlex version (mounting it under the case when using a dual-slot card), but I don't think it is feasible.
Internal HDPlex concept
1) It can't be done in a space efficient way, so making it internal it just detracts from the overall compactness of the setup.
2) The design would be flimsy and unstable due to the heightened center of gravity. Adding a thicker central spine would then cause the riser to be misaligned, requiring additional versions of the expansion module.
So I have decided to focus development on a new project which will allow much better modularity between power supplies, graphics/storage, and form factors, while still being backward compatible with DeskNano. It will also be more mainstream as I'll be taking the concepts from DeskNano and applying it to the ITX space. I don't plan to design any further modules for this case so this is the end of development.
Last edited:
No, Deskmini x300 only. b660 and Deskmeet support will be rolled into the next project.
Can you clarify what you mean re: "while still being backwards compatible with desk nano" vs "this is the end of development (for desk nano)"? Do you mean the new project will be compatible with desk mini?The DeskMini board is just so small that it was causing issues with trying to sandwich taller video cards to the other side.
For this reason I came up with a taller expansion slot module version which elevates the whole case by 5mm, so it should be more compatible with larger cards like the 3080 and MSI Aero series (125mm Height). I've published this on printables.
GPU Adapter for DeskMini and DeskNano x300 by msystems | Download free STL model | Printables.com
1 or 2 Slot versions, various styles | Download free 3D printable STL models
I also took a look at prototyping the internal HDPlex version (mounting it under the case when using a dual-slot card), but I don't think it is feasible.
Internal HDPlex concept
1) It can't be done in a space efficient way, so making it internal it just detracts from the overall compactness of the setup.
2) The design would be flimsy and unstable due to the heightened center of gravity. Adding a thicker central spine would then cause the riser to be misaligned, requiring additional versions of the expansion module.
So I have decided to focus development on a new project which will allow much better modularity between power supplies, graphics/storage, and form factors, while still being backward compatible with DeskNano. It will also be more mainstream as I'll be taking the concepts from DeskNano and applying it to the ITX space. I don't plan to design any further modules for this case so this is the end of development.
Yes, it will support multiple form factors (and the original Desknano case). It's a family of cases under a single system.
Can't wait to see what you've got up your sleeve, this time! I just assembled my own desknano and I am absolutely impressed with the ingenuity that you exercised in this project.
but unfortunately it doesn't fit with my 
Nice print, looks great. I've never seen anyone print that style version yet so you might be the first.
Although the top side m.2 won't accommodate standard m.2 heatsinks, it might be possible to use VGA Dram styled heatsinks.
The rear m.2 can accommodate a standard m.2 heatsink when combined with the ssd caddy expansion (this will give about an extra 10mm vertical clearance to the m.2 slot).
Do you remember having to change any configurations in the BIOS to use the rear m2 for the gpu riser?2-Slot, 200mm length "Pico" version of the GPU module has been built. Room for one SSD was integrated.
Compatibility:
Length- 201mm max with the Pico, or unlimited with external power
Width- 2 slots
Height- Reference height recommended, but the module can be inverted for more height and the input power socket relocated
Input Voltage- 16 to 24v with the Pico
TDP- Less than 200w with the Pico
Full writeup is posted on egpu.io
Files
GPU Adapter for DeskMini and DeskNano x300 by msystems | Download free STL model | Printables.com
1 or 2 Slot versions, various styles | Download free 3D printable STL models
Although this version is super compact, making the cabling for the Pico is not very fun, so i'd only recommend going the Pico route it if you really enjoy modding and making cables. And the reliability of the Pico is unknown.
The HDPlex version will be much more "off the shelf" and doesn't need any custom cables, except for the latching switch, which is optional (it can just be jumpered "on" permanently).
For some reason, my setup only works if the riser is connected to the front m2. I know the rear m2 slot works because I put my boot drive back there and everything works perfectly. I get video out of the gpu and everything. But switch them around and the gpu doesnt register at all. Using a Pico 200 to power the gpu.
Similar threads
