I didn’t even think about bend radius, panel thickness, and frame.
The DAN C4 has a width of 127.3mm.
You guys bending space and time are just straight wizards.
I didn’t even think about bend radius, panel thickness, and frame.
The DAN C4 has a width of 127.3mm.
You guys bending space and time are just straight wizards.
This has already been covered in the previous ten posts.
We have started working on a 120 mm AIO solution in the PSU area, as suggested by somebody here alreadyThis will limit GPU length though
We have not tested this combination (ASETEK 545 LC & FTW3) yet, so I can't guarantee it. Do you perhaps have some measurements of the FTW3? I can check the model if you do have them![]()
Going from 92mm to 120mm would increase width by 28mm and 120mm fans are x15 vs the 92mm fans 14mm. Adding 30mm to the width (15mm for each side) is pretty significant when the chassis width is 125mm, nearly 25% increase.
I guess, my point wasnt super clear. I do agree this change is definitely significant in the scope of the project; what I was trying to say is overall the size of the case would be small (relative to the competition) while balancing a fairly superior hardware compatibility. But again, if air cooling is good enough (for 95w TDP) this change is not needed at all. All depends on what balance of hardware, performance, and foot print the team is looking for. IMO the 25% increase in size is worth the ability of cramming some pretty high end stuff in the case (only if air cooling proves to be insufficient); but again, could be speaking for myself.
If it gives increased compatibility across a more widely available range of components I would say it's worth it.I get your pointHmm it would be theoretically possible to make the enclosure 5 mm wider in order to have enough room for a 120mm wide component. One could also increase the height with 5 mm. These changes would give room for an unofficial compatibility with 120mm case fans / AIOs + larger GPUs. What do you guys think?
I get your pointHmm it would be theoretically possible to make the enclosure 5 mm wider in order to have enough room for a 120mm wide component. One could also increase the height with 5 mm. These changes would give room for an unofficial compatibility with 120mm case fans / AIOs + larger GPUs. What do you guys think?
I get your pointHmm it would be theoretically possible to make the enclosure 5 mm wider in order to have enough room for a 120mm wide component. One could also increase the height with 5 mm. These changes would give room for an unofficial compatibility with 120mm case fans / AIOs + larger GPUs. What do you guys think?
I think you're right, but we can always dreamThough im not sure if the larger and taller cards with a 120mm aio could be contained within the 8-9L range. I do think it is possible/ideal to aim for reference sized cards to fit. As this will still cater to most of the community and hardware isnt in short supply as evga is a solid brand that has a few models still based on the reference PCB 2 lot design.
There was a hold up with some prototype parts because one of the CNC producers managed to injure his eye, causing a delay. Everything is back on track now and I'll go out and grab all hardware & run tests as soon as these parts get here. Say 1 - 2 weeks![]()
Any update on those two?We have started working on a 120 mm AIO solution in the PSU area, as suggested by somebody here alreadyThis will limit GPU length though