Completed MJOLNIR: The minimalistic – but not boring – 9.7L Case

Which MJOLNIR I are you interested in?

  • Standard Version - 299 USD

    Votes: 485 74.4%
  • RGB Version (No controller) - 319 USD

    Votes: 63 9.7%
  • RGB Version (With controller) - 349 USD

    Votes: 104 16.0%

  • Total voters
    652

AlexTzone

I design minimalistic – but not boring – PC stuff
Original poster
THOR ZONE
Silver Supporter
Sep 23, 2017
1,349
2,826
thor-zone.com
I didn’t even think about bend radius, panel thickness, and frame.

The DAN C4 has a width of 127.3mm.

You guys bending space and time are just straight wizards.

 

Tazpr

Master of Cramming
Aug 7, 2018
553
429
We have started working on a 120 mm AIO solution in the PSU area, as suggested by somebody here already :thumb: This will limit GPU length though

We have not tested this combination (ASETEK 545 LC & FTW3) yet, so I can't guarantee it. Do you perhaps have some measurements of the FTW3? I can check the model if you do have them :)

Dimensions
  • Height: 5.618in - 142.69mm
  • Length: 11.8in - 299.72mm
  • Width: Dual Slot
It looks like it would fit *just* length wise, but may be out by a few mm in the height area, although the card is not a perfect cube so it may fit...
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexTzone

dlal1520

Average Stuffer
Dec 20, 2017
57
59
Going from 92mm to 120mm would increase width by 28mm and 120mm fans are x15 vs the 92mm fans 14mm. Adding 30mm to the width (15mm for each side) is pretty significant when the chassis width is 125mm, nearly 25% increase.

I guess, my point wasnt super clear. I do agree this change is definitely significant in the scope of the project; what I was trying to say is overall the size of the case would be small (relative to the competition) while balancing a fairly superior hardware compatibility. But again, if air cooling is good enough (for 95w TDP) this change is not needed at all. All depends on what balance of hardware, performance, and foot print the team is looking for. IMO the 25% increase in size is worth the ability of cramming some pretty high end stuff in the case (only if air cooling proves to be insufficient); but again, could be speaking for myself.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AlexTzone

AlexTzone

I design minimalistic – but not boring – PC stuff
Original poster
THOR ZONE
Silver Supporter
Sep 23, 2017
1,349
2,826
thor-zone.com
I guess, my point wasnt super clear. I do agree this change is definitely significant in the scope of the project; what I was trying to say is overall the size of the case would be small (relative to the competition) while balancing a fairly superior hardware compatibility. But again, if air cooling is good enough (for 95w TDP) this change is not needed at all. All depends on what balance of hardware, performance, and foot print the team is looking for. IMO the 25% increase in size is worth the ability of cramming some pretty high end stuff in the case (only if air cooling proves to be insufficient); but again, could be speaking for myself.

I get your point :) Hmm it would be theoretically possible to make the enclosure 5 mm wider in order to have enough room for a 120mm wide component. One could also increase the height with 5 mm. These changes would give room for an unofficial compatibility with 120mm case fans / AIOs + larger GPUs. What do you guys think?
 
  • Like
Reactions: dlal1520

Tazpr

Master of Cramming
Aug 7, 2018
553
429
I get your point :) Hmm it would be theoretically possible to make the enclosure 5 mm wider in order to have enough room for a 120mm wide component. One could also increase the height with 5 mm. These changes would give room for an unofficial compatibility with 120mm case fans / AIOs + larger GPUs. What do you guys think?
If it gives increased compatibility across a more widely available range of components I would say it's worth it.
If I'm spending this amount on a case I want to make sure it lasts a long time and is able to stay compatible with future products for years to come.
 

dlal1520

Average Stuffer
Dec 20, 2017
57
59
I get your point :) Hmm it would be theoretically possible to make the enclosure 5 mm wider in order to have enough room for a 120mm wide component. One could also increase the height with 5 mm. These changes would give room for an unofficial compatibility with 120mm case fans / AIOs + larger GPUs. What do you guys think?

Yes! That would be amazing. Increasing the capability for 120mm and large gpus, while looking this good, will help blow past most of your competition. Plus it helps future proof your case for newer hardware, as larger gpus are easier to find (same holds true for the 120mm aios). Plus, once you get to thermal testing, 120mm aios/ case fans should greatly help.

My only question is would this 5mm adjustment allow for the 120mm aio to fit in the same orientation that the original 92mm would fit? or would the orientation be different?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AlexTzone

For_Science

Master of Cramming
Feb 16, 2018
447
613
I get your point :) Hmm it would be theoretically possible to make the enclosure 5 mm wider in order to have enough room for a 120mm wide component. One could also increase the height with 5 mm. These changes would give room for an unofficial compatibility with 120mm case fans / AIOs + larger GPUs. What do you guys think?

Hello (from Stockholm)! Just expressing my interest in this product :)

92 mm AIO coolers are getting increasing more rare, and with the currently available copper 92 mm radiators, there is no product that is less than 35 mm thick, making the future outlook of liquid cooling fairly bleak.

On the otherhand 120 mm radiators are of plenty and there are good pump/block combos like the one in the Eisbaer LT (Alphacool) that could be used to make a custom loop (like in the render). So I would think making the case accomodate a 120mm radiator a super great idea.

If that means that 2.5-slot cards can be mounted, that would be super, just because I have a 1080Ti Strix (although not a must, in my opinion). Otherwise as long as the FTW3 sized cards fits, I guess that caters for most.

Also, in the interest of having the radiator higher than the cpu block to minimize air acculation in the pump area, if there are no adverse effects, an option to invert the case to put the case upside down without being ugly would be nice to watercoolers. Having a meshed top or at least cutouts + filter on the top panel would probably be necessary for decent cooling?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AlexTzone

Tazpr

Master of Cramming
Aug 7, 2018
553
429
I think if they could create space for a 120mm AIO under the GPU (and allow compatibility of my 305mm long FTW3) and keep it under 9L it would be a near perfect case. To be able to account for almost any dual slot card and a 120mm AIO you would meet the requirements for 90% of SFF enthusiasts and would be something I would absolutely back and purchase. The quality of build and attention to detail is enough to me to justify the price, but that level of compatibility and component options would just make it close to perfect, as I don't know of any other production cases that use this layout that are able to support a 120mm AIO internally with full sized parts in under 9 litres
 

dlal1520

Average Stuffer
Dec 20, 2017
57
59
Though im not sure if the larger and taller cards with a 120mm aio could be contained within the 8-9L range. I do think it is possible/ideal to aim for reference sized cards to fit. As this will still cater to most of the community and hardware isnt in short supply as evga is a solid brand that has a few models still based on the reference PCB 2 lot design.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexTzone

Tazpr

Master of Cramming
Aug 7, 2018
553
429
Though im not sure if the larger and taller cards with a 120mm aio could be contained within the 8-9L range. I do think it is possible/ideal to aim for reference sized cards to fit. As this will still cater to most of the community and hardware isnt in short supply as evga is a solid brand that has a few models still based on the reference PCB 2 lot design.
I think you're right, but we can always dream XD
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexTzone

wolfatpno

Cable-Tie Ninja
Sep 8, 2018
159
212
How about expanding Total volume for [120mm AIO / add system cooler]?
(Ghost s1 - top hat)


or.....


apply this on top panel. :Q
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AlexTzone

JDK

SFF Lingo Aficionado
Sep 25, 2018
96
93
There was a hold up with some prototype parts because one of the CNC producers managed to injure his eye, causing a delay. Everything is back on track now and I'll go out and grab all hardware & run tests as soon as these parts get here. Say 1 - 2 weeks :D

We have started working on a 120 mm AIO solution in the PSU area, as suggested by somebody here already :thumb: This will limit GPU length though
Any update on those two?

Much better trailer btw!
 

AlexTzone

I design minimalistic – but not boring – PC stuff
Original poster
THOR ZONE
Silver Supporter
Sep 23, 2017
1,349
2,826
thor-zone.com
Guys, sorry for the lack of communication the past week. We put in full horse to complete the new trailer and progress further with the prototype. Going to answer all your questions and bring a nice update tomorrow :)