2022-04-28: after several prototypes in hand, we are almost ready to reveal
It took longer than we would have liked because we wanted a better product and at a better price, just more work involved
Can't wait for my Meshlicious 1.0 to look like hot garbage next to the redesign.
Idk, I might be getting too set in my ways, but I'm skeptical of the new design making the old one look bad. It'll be difficult to top.
I think I'd like to see it a bit deeper overall to accomodate some thicker rads maybe and allowing pump/rads to fit better internally. Maybe a bit more height to allow more room for cables at the bottom or thus adding a top fan natively.
Me too. One of the many strengths of this case IMO.
It looks like, but they wrote "brand new Meshroom ITX case". So that is maybe the new version?
Judging by the pictures, it's exactly the same - all the internal cut-outs and clearances look the same, and if they were to make a larger version I doubt it would be so small a change that it wouldn't be visible.
There's a big difference between saying "a brand new X" and "the brand new X" - the latter indicates that X is new in a general sense, while the former just indicates that the specific iteration in question is new (and not used).
Is it official, I like it btw,we need glass,and that it , nothing on official web page for now....
Meshroom seems to be SSUPD's own meshilicious refresh.
W360, representing NCASE, came up with the original Meshilicious and SSUPD handled execution.
W360 then left SSUPD, and is now still represented by NCASE, but with Streacom handling execution.
The Meshilicious redesign this thread is about is the latter, the NCASE x Streacom partnership.
W360, representing NCASE, came up with the original Meshilicious and SSUPD handled execution.
W360 then left SSUPD, and is now still represented by NCASE, but with Streacom handling execution.
The Meshilicious redesign this thread is about is the latter, the NCASE x Streacom partnership.
If I were to guess: a small switch in that new hole directly above the motherboard I/O (the slightly larger one with screw mounting holes on each side).
A mistake IMO, but then I guess people don't really use power buttons all that often, so it might not matter. Still an odd decision: more front I/O is a very "for the mainstream" kind of move, while moving the power button to the back where you can't see it or even tell that it's there unless you know what to look for is a very "SFF enthusiast" kind of move. Trying to please everyone, and thus not pleasing anyone?
Similar threads
