Edit button if you're on mobile is in the [...] button next to the report button.
-
Save 15% on ALL SFF Network merch, until Dec 31st! Use code SFF2024 at checkout. Click here!
not mobile, my actual current a300 with a 3200g ^^
so we have actually a chance to see a S/PDIF on the renoir mini, good times to be alive
ups i did it again, hey asrock you could stack the hdmi and displayport or place them like a big I next to each other
so we have actually a chance to see a S/PDIF on the renoir mini, good times to be alive
ups i did it again, hey asrock you could stack the hdmi and displayport or place them like a big I next to each other
That sounds promising, but then I also expect the 4700G to be a $300 APU, so performance needs to be on point. The 4400G (or whatever the 6c+7CU one ends up being named, I would say 4600G makes a lot more sense) interests me a lot more mostly due to price, though given the price of the very similarly specced 3600(X) there's an open question about where that will land too. Definitely not expecting it to cost the same as a 3400G despite possibly following in the same naming tier.
Hm, I was wondering why the scores were scaling so badly, then I looked at the combined scores. Wonder what is going on there - power limits hitting the higher core count parts, perhaps? (Though if that's the case, why is the 4700G higher than the 4400G when it has both more cores and higher clocks?) Nonetheless, the 4200G combined score seems disproportionately high unless the other chips are severely misconfigured in some way. Should still make for a good upgrade for my HTPC though; the poor A8-7600 in that just does ~1400 overall, 1500 graphics and a lowly 530 combined. The way this looks scaling-wise I might go for a 4200G and go balls-to-the-wall on memory rather than springing for a faster APU.4200G:
4400G:
4700G:
@ASRock System
can you please do a solid and request of suppor that when some time is there to spare, update the AGESA and associated modules on the A300, would be great for 1.0.0.5 that AMD released, but hell, id take 1.0.0.4b even...
Support tickets have been useless, I only found out about the beta bios because I found it when I searched:
forum.asrock.com
BETA Bios 3.53 which has newer (don't recall the specific revision), works fine, no issues as the bugs where in AGESA and associated modules for Zen+
I own and have sold and recommended about 20 of these so far, but myself and 2 others who have them cannot do VM's on it due to the 1.0.0.1 AGESA and associated modules which DO NOT play well with Zen+!
can you please do a solid and request of suppor that when some time is there to spare, update the AGESA and associated modules on the A300, would be great for 1.0.0.5 that AMD released, but hell, id take 1.0.0.4b even...
Support tickets have been useless, I only found out about the beta bios because I found it when I searched:
(Solved)Deskmini A300 Hyper-V_boot failure
Same problem on my end as well.I enabled Hyper-V on Windows so I could set up Kubernetes. On reboot,...
BETA Bios 3.53 which has newer (don't recall the specific revision), works fine, no issues as the bugs where in AGESA and associated modules for Zen+
I own and have sold and recommended about 20 of these so far, but myself and 2 others who have them cannot do VM's on it due to the 1.0.0.1 AGESA and associated modules which DO NOT play well with Zen+!
Can't expect more than that from 8 CUs. Though you might get another decent bump from pairing it with some fast memory I guess.
@ASRock System
I emailed your tech support, but they never got back to me.
Can I get the dimensional drawings for stx motherboards? It would be helpful to get the exact drawings for case designs.
I emailed your tech support, but they never got back to me.
Can I get the dimensional drawings for stx motherboards? It would be helpful to get the exact drawings for case designs.
We can't expect performance of GPUs with GDDR5(X)/GDDR6 when we have "non-G" DDR4, there's going to be a bottleneck anyway or they need to implement HBM2 somewhere. But that would make the CPU too expensive for the intended markets.
www.gamersnexus.net
www.gamersnexus.net
Considering the APU uses DDR4 and beats a most likely GDDR5 card, this result is more than impressive.
Differences Between DDR4 & GDDR5 Memory | GamersNexus
stub The finer distinctions between DDR and GDDR can easily be masked by the impressive on-paper specs of the newer GDDR5 standards, often inviting an obvious question with a not-so-obvious answer: Why can’t GDDR5 serve as system memory? In a simple response, it’s analogous to why a GPU cannot...
GT 1030 DDR4 vs. GDDR5 Benchmark: A Disgrace of a Graphics Card | GamersNexus
stub This is something we haven’t seen before. NVidia has taken a relatively successful card, the GT 1030, and has implanted DDR4 in place of GDDR5. It’s actually getting system memory on it, which is a tremendous downgrade. The memory bandwidth reduction is several-fold, dropping from 48GB/s to...
Considering the APU uses DDR4 and beats a most likely GDDR5 card, this result is more than impressive.
Although I didn't get your mail, I am afraid that we can't provide the detailed drawing of mini-STX motherboard due to that is confidential.
@ASRock System
Can it be easier to assemble the same dimensions of the case?
www.akasa.com.tw
Can it be easier to assemble the same dimensions of the case?
Cypher ST | Compact Mini STX case | Akasa Thermal Solution
Akasa branded products including cables, cases, card readers, coolers, external enclosures, fans in many colours, hubs, and power supplies |Cypher ST | Compact Mini STX case |
Last edited by a moderator:
Similar threads
