That's a sweet looking mesh! What is your workflow to configure slicer only for selected area of the part to make it a mesh? I have been experimenting with that and were only able to "stack" two different parts with different settings together to make a complex "combined" mesh. But maybe you have a better workflow?
Lol, here I was the other day thinking pretty much exactly that "I wish I could use the support exclusion blocks to selectively implement 3Dmesh." Thank you for this. Have to play around with the slicer even more now! So many options and settings to find and figure out.Prusaslicer allows you to use 'modifier shapes' to change settings at certain areas of your part, which can be used to choose where to set the top and bottom perimeters to 0.
View attachment 1933
Orange is the part, green is the modifier block. The green block changes the perimeter settings where it interferes with the part. Modifier blocks can be cubes, cilinders, spheres, or even STL's you made yourself.
View attachment 1934
Sliced result. Have yet to print this though as my printer is at a friends place at the moment.
Lol, here I was the other day thinking pretty much exactly that "I wish I could use the support exclusion blocks to selectively implement 3Dmesh." Thank you for this. Have to play around with the slicer even more now! So many options and settings to find and figure out.
Awesome, thank you. Will be looking into that nowIt works the exact same way, only difference is that it allows you to change pretty much any settings and not just support settings. Right click your part on the right panel and this is what you are looking for (pardon the Dutch):
View attachment 1936
After you positioned/scaled your modifier, you can right click that layer and select Layers and perimeters
View attachment 1937
Really like your work! Can't wait to see b660 version!a300 and x300 only, for now.
B660 is a possibility, but at the moment, it is poorly optimized and I don't recommend it until it gets further bios and microcode updates. It has worse integrated gaming performance, worse multi-core, and a 75 watt hard limit (x300 has 120 watts++). I have the B660 and only use it as a test bed for the on/off switches.
H470 |
B660 |
No - the front I/O is the same, but the rear I/O is different, and there would need to be changes to the Tray as it was designed for the board.
However the H470 has the same front and rear I/O as the newer b660 version. And it has a similar board layout. So if I make a b660 version, it should also fit the H470 version, maybe with some small changes. If the socket position is the same then the lids for both versions would be compatible also.
H470
B660