Glad someone linked that it was a pretty good read when I saw it the other day.Pst pst, it's not that simple.
Glad someone linked that it was a pretty good read when I saw it the other day.Pst pst, it's not that simple.
Pst pst, it's not that simple.
Yup, I am aware of that. Just found Intel answer to be very stupid.
It's the same blanket "we do not recommend you void the warranty" they have given for years. They have also made chipsets that allow overclocking and CPU SKUs with unlocked multipliers for decades, you just don't get warranty support if you kill it by overvolting or pushing it harder than your cooling can handle.Intel's actual answer said:We do not recommend running outside the processor specifications, such as by exceeding processor frequency or voltage specifications, or removing of the integrated heat spreader (sometimes called ‘de-lidding’). These actions will void the processor warranty.”
The FSP850-50FGPH1? Trust me, you don't want it. I got to test it briefly at Computex and the thing screams like a banshee at only 300W load.
In theory: delidding is easily detected, failures induced due to overvolting could potentially be detected by examining the die.Do they have a reliable way of checking if you fried your processor overclocking or if it was just product failure? I presume the answer is yes, but I just would be curious to know how they would know.
I know a guy on OC.net that sent wet( from condensation) 5960X to RMA and he got replacement unit. So i dont think that delided CPU would be a problem for RMAing.In theory: delidding is easily detected, failures induced due to overvolting could potentially be detected by examining the die.
In practice: I have yet to hear of anyone who has had a warranty claim rejected after sending off a chip due to them overclocking it. There are even cases where people have outright stated they delidded and overclocked a K/X chip and still received a replacement. If you are repeatedly RMAing processors then it would probably not be looked on so leniently.
I have heard of warranty claims rejected due to damage to the top of the IHS (e.g. lapping, using 'liquid metal' TIM) that partially or totally obscured the product codes, so that seems to be the main concern.
tl;dr: Unless there is visible external evidence on the outside of the package, the warranty claim will likely go through.
Glad they fed traffic back to the site, but those comments... *Cringe* Hopefully they read up on it.ASUS ROG just shared this on FB.
Still dreaming love that the guy thought it was from Inwin.https://www.reddit.com/r/sffpc/comments/6m11yf/anyone_know_what_case_this_is_sorry_for_potato/
so linus already did a review and it's up on floatplane? or am i still dreaming?
edit: not the full review just a teaser in a construction vlog
so linus already did a review and it's up on floatplane? or am i still dreaming?
edit: not the full review just a teaser in a construction vlog
Nice video on Floatplane ; ) Grats on the limelight, you definitely deserve it.
Also out of curiosity what cable did you use for the HDMI passthrough?
Is Floatplane 1 or 2 weeks ahead?