There are 2015 and 2017 results
i5-4288U is around 850
https://www.google.com/search?q=i5-4288u+site:http://valid.x86.fr/bench/
that makes more sense.
There are 2015 and 2017 results
i5-4288U is around 850
https://www.google.com/search?q=i5-4288u+site:http://valid.x86.fr/bench/
Just came across this and quickly benchmarked my current build - as-is right now, with no optimisation or overclocking whatsoever (running rock stable), incl overhead for remote access as running headless...
score:
2489451 - petricor - i7 8700k - GTX 1080 - (3806.5*3270)/5.0
validation link: https://valid.x86.fr/vtuftp
benchmarks:
build (slightly ahead of my log.. am a few posts behind!):
Just came across this and quickly benchmarked my current build - as-is right now, with no optimisation or overclocking whatsoever (running rock stable), incl overhead for remote access as running headless...
I use a MeanWell 200/12V for the 1080 (the long silver thing below the main board), and the HDPLEX 160 to power board and cpu - with a load switch between them. For details see my build log hereWhat power supplies are you running? I see the HDPlex 160, but that wouldn't do for the 1080 too?
edit: rewritten to be more clear.
A heatsink isn't a simple box, it's a stack of fins. Adding up the surface area of a stack of fins is almost exactly how you learn to calculate volume at the start of calculus. Heatsink surface area scales linearly with volume, not external area.
So if all the extra stuff takes up 25mm, and your case is 100m thick, your heatsink can use 75mm (75%) of the thickness, but if your case is 50mm thick, you only have 25mm (50%) of the room for it. So reducing your case thickness by 2x reduced your max heatsink size by 3x!
(Note: these are made up numbers and probably exaggerate the issue.)
So it's actually the reverse of your claim, thermals get worse at a greater than 1:1 ratio as you shrink the case thickness.
Updated everything, but I can't accept this methodology because if I compare my i5 7300U, which is an ES sample, so technically the way it's programmed acts like an i7 7500U, but your CPU-Z score is almost 800 points (80% more) than my CPU. The CPU-Z database has the first, initial benchmark, which was very Intel sided, so they changed it in like 1.83, since then, the benchmark scores have changed considerably. A stock i7 4790K scores 2300 for example, you're not 500 points off that CPU. I'd estimate your CPU score somewhere between 700 and 800.
I hope you understand and I think if you'd like to participate, you'd need to find yourself a an old SSD/HDD that you could do these benches.
It really is amazing, and the 11L case was just big enough to cool it while still giving a s.all enough volume to be competitive.Nice job on the 3 million. You are right that 7980xe is brutal, made the score on my 8700k look mighty small.
@Duality92 LMK if I missed anything, I'm tired as hell right now so something may have slipped by me
Here we go-
6950x + 1080 ti in a DSE breathe
Really good actually, the dynatron T318 with that a12x15 runs around 80c on aida 64 with stock speedsBeautiful build. How are the temps for that 6950x in that tiny case?
From short time 1st to 5th
But congrats to all new entries and scores! No way I could beat that ^^