The 2 extra hdd can be installed only if a short graphics card is used. The bracket can be mounted on the mid plate, on the gfx card side. 1 hdd can be used only if a full size gfx card is used.I have a quick question: where are the three SSD mounting surfaces? I see the one underneath the PSU mounting location, but I do not see the others. Are they underneath the front panel?
Thank you. Do you happen to have a render or photo of what the two extra hard drives would look like? I do not think I could track one down in the post history of the thread. I only recall seeing renders of the single hard drive mount under the PSU.The 2 extra hdd can be installed only if a short graphics card is used.
Will post some new product photos after the paint work gets back. Will photo shoot mounted hdd bracket then.Thank you. Do you happen to have a render or photo of what the two extra hard drives would look like? I do not think I could track one down in the post history of the thread. I only recall seeing renders of the single hard drive mount under the PSU.
I will have to fall on the other side of the opinion pool where I hold a counter viewpoint to what Thehack stated above. My opinion is the DAN and Ghost-style design should become the dominant style of case because it offers the best blend in volume, size, and ease of use. I think it sometimes is hard to accept a repeated formula again. After all, many of us here like designing completely new things and exploring wildly different design concept. But I feel that sometimes the tried-and-true formula is the best way instead of reinventing the wheel. I assert that keeping with this style will be the best way forward for the market. Instead of design, I feel the challenge of reducing manufacturing costs and thereby product cost for the end user should be the new focus.
That is why I feel that the next challenge is making this form factor more accepted and well-known. The only way around this is reducing cost. DAN Cases and Louqe could sell more cases if they reduced the costs to be more approachable to many more people. The current price point and shipping costs make it undesirable, a major roadblock and showstopper for many people. Price is the primary factor that keeps it out of the running when other SFF cases cost less. There are less expensive SFF options that offer a few more liters of volume and cost as little as $70. One example that immediately comes to mind is RVZ02/ML08 from Silverstone. We need to now consider ways to cut costs if we want this SFF style to become prevalent.
I think of this case design debacle as something which similar to the Surface tablet style, or a tablet with kickstand, which has become widely recycled and used among PC manufacturers. It looks so similar from manufacturer to manufacturer that except for occasional minor cosmetic differences or simply a manufacturer logo, someone might mistake it for a Surface produced by Microsoft itself. A major benefit for everyone is now Surface-style tablets cost much less than the original source of their inspiration and they are now in many more hands than the Surface ever was before. Personally, I see enough minor cosmetic differences in the Nouvolo Steck from the Louqe. The top panel's perforation is shorter and it lacks the Louqe's tab. The stock feet also give it distinct look from the onset. Internally, I can see minor changes in placement of the component mounts as well. Further, the power button and power LED locations are flipped.
Indeed, the Nouvolo Steck is Louqe Ghost inspired but it is most certainly not a Louqe product nor the Ghost. The Steck is its own thing and that, among other things, is a more economically produced, inexpensive offering that actually stands a chance in making a dent in the mass market. If nothing else, this competition might heat up the market and get the two other players, DAN Cases and Louqe, into seriously relooking at their prices or considering selling lower cost versions of their current offerings. We already have the Raijintek Ophion which is most sanely priced but that is again a 10-liter+ case making it not much smaller in volume than Silverstone's RVZ02/ML02 as well as quite bigger than the Ghost and the A4. On the other hand, if the Steck is successful enough, we could very well see this smaller design style being picked up by one of the big wigs like Silverstone or Cooler Master. If marketed well, I see the Steck as a slam dunk as more competition and more innovation and less expense which is a win-win for us consumers.
Again, it is not identical. I wrote what the differences were, namely the top panel, the power LED and button, component mounts, etc:The Steck could've had his/her own design language but instead copies the Ghost S1 design.
The top panel's perforation is shorter and it lacks the Ghost's tab. The stock feet also give it distinct look from the onset. Internally, I can see minor changes in placement of the component mounts as well. Further, the power button and power LED locations are flipped.
Again, it is not identical. I wrote what the differences were, namely the top panel, the power LED and button, the included feet etc:
Look again at the image you just posted:
The top panel's perforation region is smaller on the Steck. Its top panel also omits the Ghost's tab and instead has receded lips from which to lift the panel. The power button and LED locations are flipped. There are feet as well a shroud surrounding theml. I see the design language and while I see its roots, it speaks differently to me.
I am a creative and I would beg to differ and I readily exempt myself from that narrow classification. I think a major problem with some of us creatives is that we cannot handle when someone perceives something common between us and takes that inspiration when we were too bent on going too far. The fact of the matter is some of us creatives mistakenly believe that thinking outside of the box does not constitute there not being a box to begin with. Sometimes, that means not thinking so wildly different and working within tighter parameters while adjusting others more wildly that we did not consider. I am happy that macbosco picked up on the common design between both the A4 and the Ghost and that he is making something based on that foundation which is both different and cheaper.[F]or the majority of people, especially creatives, we call this a copy.
I am a creative and I would beg to differ and I readily exclude from that narrow classification. I think a major problem with some of us creatives is that we cannot handle when someone perceives something common between us and takes that inspiration. The fact of the matter is some of us creatives mistakenly believe that thinking outside of the box does not constitute there not being a box to begin with. Sometimes, that means not thinking so wildly different and working within tighter parameters while adjusting others more wildly. I am happy that macbosco picked up on the common design between both the A4 and the Ghost and that he is making something both different and cheaper.
Just because it uses a dual chamber GPU/motherboard design under 10-liters, and it has larger CPU cooler clearance and an optional top chamber or "Top Hat" like the Ghost does not make it a mere copy. There is a bit more going on here than you are willing to admit. So for the benefit of all, I will let the photo speak for itself with these visual annotations highlighting just a few of its differences.Just cheaper my friend. Just cheaper.