• Save 15% on ALL SFF Network merch, until Dec 31st! Use code SFF2024 at checkout. Click here!

Production FormD T1 Classic (READ FIRST POST)

Increase volume from 9.8L to 10.5L to support MSI Suprim X 30XX?

  • Yes, worth the trade off to be more compatible with components

    Votes: 116 24.6%
  • No, not worth it b/c it is not better than the ROG 30XX, which fits now at <10L

    Votes: 356 75.4%

  • Total voters
    472

Truth

Formerly TutorialIsland
Mar 19, 2020
90
46
Guy with the corsair cpu cooler how are your temps with the 120 aio, I'm a bit worried about temps tbh.
 

0Zx

Trash Compacter
Mar 14, 2020
52
123

Lol at them omitting critical dimensions on what is intended to look like a real mechanical drawing. Technically, it should have a third view, callouts for the holes, among other things, but I digress. Why wouldn't EK just release their actual CAD drawing instead of this pseudo-technical drawing with incomplete information?

0Zx
 

SSJ4

SFF Lingo Aficionado
Feb 10, 2020
131
210
www.ospreygaming.com.au
Lol at them omitting critical dimensions on what is intended to look like a real mechanical drawing. Technically, it should have a third view, callouts for the holes, among other things, but I digress. Why wouldn't EK just release their actual CAD drawing instead of this pseudo-technical drawing with incomplete information?

0Zx
Because the drawing is meant for your average consumer. A full orthogonal drawing with a BOM is completely overkill and confusing. A CAD model is only beneficial to people with the know how to pull data from it. And no company is going to give you a complete engineering drawing for their product. A pseudo-technical drawing is more than you are going to get from most companies for any of their products.

Also when doing these drawings you only add views if there are critical dimensions you cannot pull from the other views. Callouts are also pointless because the fitting and screw holes are standardized and listed in the other specs, at least for the fittings.

So yeh. That drawing really only needed 1 additional dimension that would allow you to determine everything else.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For you cheapscapes out there like me you can mod the AM3 bracket for the Eisbaer to take AM4. It's a bit janky but it does work. Yet to check clearance of fittings on my motherboard because it will mount on a slight angle now. But worst-case scenario it doesnt fit. Btw I did this because there isnt a shop that offers the AM4 Bracket for a reasonable price including shipping for Australia.

I hit it with some black primer then some clear to seal the metal back up. Didnt have any black paint on hand, unfortunately.

I'd recommend wider washers if you do this mod also.

 
Last edited:

Wahaha360

a.k.a W360
Original poster
SFFLAB
NCASE
SSUPD
Feb 23, 2015
2,131
10,697
Anyone has ROG 2080TI?

I want to measure the thickness from PCB to Fan Shroud (including PCB thickness).
 

fabio

Shrink Ray Wielder
Apr 6, 2016
1,885
4,325
Whats the performance level of this radiator btw? Couldn't find any reviews. Ive read the standard sE240 is poo.

Guess all the 240 rads of similar spec would all be within a degree or 2 of eachother.
Actually the reviews of the standard CoolStream SE240 are related to the previous version, the 26mm. Now there is the new version of 28mm (I have no clue what has changed and the thermal performance difference!)

The performance of the one I have, I don't know actually! I did a few test before with the EKWB and the Alphacool LT, but they were using different blocks, so we cannot really compare those numbers.

BUT, I agree that there will be only 2/3 degrees of difference between rads with similar specs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AMv8-1day and SSJ4

Brude27

Master of Cramming
Jun 21, 2018
384
878
@Wahaha360 My GPU bracket doesn't line up properly:


Anyone else with their case having this same issue? I can only either get the L shaped bracket on, or the top bracket on... but not both at the same time.
 

fabio

Shrink Ray Wielder
Apr 6, 2016
1,885
4,325
@Wahaha360 My GPU bracket doesn't line up properly:


Anyone else with their case having this same issue? I can only either get the L shaped bracket on, or the top bracket on... but not both at the same time.
I had the same at the beginning! If you can move down the riser and push down a bit the GPU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brude27

Brude27

Master of Cramming
Jun 21, 2018
384
878
I had the same at the beginning! If you can move down the riser and push down a bit the GPU.
Brilliant! I see I must’ve used the wrong threads for the riser. Thank you for the quick reply!
 
Last edited:

DrHudacris

King of Cable Management
Jul 20, 2019
918
1,720
Wait... @fabio I just tried that and still don't have the room I need... I'll try to figure it out.

I had the same issue! I was using PCI slot covers for the empty slots and they are too thick. I removed those and then the screw holes did fit. But I see that you are not using blank slot covers. Maybe wiggle the GPU to and fro? I think if the slots on the PCI hold down bracket were slotted a bit more (right now they look ovoid, so just a bit more) and it would work.
 

Brude27

Master of Cramming
Jun 21, 2018
384
878
@DrHudacris @fabio I took everything apart again to make sure I wasn't missing something or had something installed incorrectly, and everything is installed the way it should be. I tried a lot of different ways to get it to work, and I finally said fuck it and bent the lip of the L shaped lower GPU bracket as sloppily shown in the below image:



Either that bracket needs to be bent more out of the factory, or the hole @DrHudacris mentioned on the upper GPU bracket needs to be cut like a fan/radiator mounting rail like the below sloppily shown image:



I'd say the hole being a rail would make more sense than cutting the two separate holes, but I'll leave that up to @Wahaha360 to decide.

Back to the build! I'll hopefully have some build pics to post later. :)
 

fabio

Shrink Ray Wielder
Apr 6, 2016
1,885
4,325
@DrHudacris @fabio I took everything apart again to make sure I wasn't missing something or had something installed incorrectly, and everything is installed the way it should be. I tried a lot of different ways to get it to work, and I finally said fuck it and bent the lip of the L shaped lower GPU bracket as sloppily shown in the below image:



Either that bracket needs to be bent more out of the factory, or the hole @DrHudacris mentioned on the upper GPU bracket needs to be cut like a fan/radiator mounting rail like the below sloppily shown image:



I'd say the hole being a rail would make more sense than cutting the two separate holes, but I'll leave that up to @Wahaha360 to decide.

Back to the build! I'll hopefully have some build pics to post later. :)

I agree that if the rail was a bit longer and the entire secure-bracket offset by 0.3mm there will be no issue!

BTW, I've setup the fan speed in the BIOS having them in step 20%-40C, 50%-55C-80%-75C.

Basically the max fan speed is 1450rpm! The build now is more silent than before!

Here a temp screenshot while rendering in Vray for Rhino. Maybe I've lost 1 degree? The chipset as well is 2 degrees warmer.

(but again, I am above a turned on radiator :D).

The pump is SUPER SILENT! I think having it suspended between the radiator and the GPU avoids the vibration on the chassis.

 

threestripevida

Airflow Optimizer
Mar 28, 2017
277
466
I agree that if the rail was a bit longer and the entire secure-bracket offset by 0.3mm there will be no issue!

BTW, I've setup the fan speed in the BIOS having them in step 20%-40C, 50%-55C-80%-75C.

Basically the max fan speed is 1450rpm! The build now is more silent than before!

Here a temp screenshot while rendering in Vray for Rhino. Maybe I've lost 1 degree? The chipset as well is 2 degrees warmer.

(but again, I am above a turned on radiator :D).

The pump is SUPER SILENT! I think having it suspended between the radiator and the GPU avoids the vibration on the chassis.


If you didn't have the option for the pump you have. Would you have used the LT Solo? Or would you have found some other solution?
 

fabio

Shrink Ray Wielder
Apr 6, 2016
1,885
4,325
If you didn't have the option for the pump you have. Would you have used the LT Solo? Or would you have found some other solution?
I think I would go first with the Apogee Drive II, (but on my motherboard the mounting bracket is 1mm to big so scratch a bit the VRM heatsink).
Trying first the DDC PMW 18W (if you have the fan header supporting 24W/2A, you can rewire it as well) and having it working at 40% to have it silent.
Than I will try the EKWB DDC MX 3.1 6W pump PMW always with the Apogee.
(I've tried the MX310from Alphacool, but I didn't like the pitch noise).

If I will be not comfortable with temps,noise/fill the loop with quick disconnect ,etc, I will stay for sure with the LT Solo.

Is a great pump, especially if you want to watercool only the CPU! I guess my flow is pretty good because the pump is just before the radiator, and all my blocks are very low restrictive!
 
  • Like
Reactions: bynio

DrHudacris

King of Cable Management
Jul 20, 2019
918
1,720
Update on my build: ran into some snags. The GPX pro Solo mounting results in the hardware protruding behind the GPU about 11mm which is way too much. Thanks to someone (I'm sorry I forgot who, might have been @fabio) mentioning the purpose of the small tabs as a way to use bifurcation, moved the riser to the second slot and was able to seat the GPU with cooler. I also switched back to slim Silverstone fans instead of 20mm Deepcool fans, just to have some more room to work on the motherboard and to prevent PSU cables from interfering with fan. I could have inverted the PSU but then the tubing run would not have worked out from motherboard.