Are there plans for more 2.0 Cases to come back in stock? Or future plans for a 3.0 revision in the works?
Right now we have to focus on paperwork for this shipment and Paypal isn't making this easy.
For what's next, we'd like to be able to make those cases in larger quantities for stock without issues, which should let us think about handing off the sales to stores maybe or setting up a shop that's running all the time, but this needs some preparations that take time.
As for the design changes, right now 2.1 seems more likely than 3.0 meaning there's really not much wrong with the layout and design of the case itself, but there are some details that we need to change if we want to improve our manufacturing process.
The 3.0 thing is probably a discussion for the next year after we'll see Zen 3 and next gen GPUs being delivered.
Could you please explain on these details? It only means the manufacturing process changes or there will be new features?Right now we have to focus on paperwork for this shipment and Paypal isn't making this easy.
For what's next, we'd like to be able to make those cases in larger quantities for stock without issues, which should let us think about handing off the sales to stores maybe or setting up a shop that's running all the time, but this needs some preparations that take time.
As for the design changes, right now 2.1 seems more likely than 3.0 meaning there's really not much wrong with the layout and design of the case itself, but there are some details that we need to change if we want to improve our manufacturing process.
The 3.0 thing is probably a discussion for the next year after we'll see Zen 3 and next gen GPUs being delivered.
Could you please explain on these details? It only means the manufacturing process changes or there will be new features?
Is there a sense of waiting for RTX 3070/Ti Founders to build Sentry?
I'm wondering if will fit in case and it wont be a overkill.
Are Mini DTX boards such as the ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Impact compatible with the Sentry?
Regarding CPU cooling, I can confirm that I set my 3700X to 68W I think it was, with motherboard backplate removed and it got to mid 80s with L9a + duct in testing.
The duct is not to separate fan from cooler, but to make sure the hot air doesn't cycle back into the fan, so it's essentially that kind of thing you usually had in those old ATX tower cases with a duct attached to the perforation on the side panel.could you please elaborate on the "duct" part of your mesage? I just bought a Sentry 2.0 in the sale and also have a NH-L9a-AM4. I plan to build a duct to separate the fan from the cooler a bit and would be interested in your experiences.
Hi,
could you please elaborate on the "duct" part of your mesage? I just bought a Sentry 2.0 in the sale and also have a NH-L9a-AM4. I plan to build a duct to separate the fan from the cooler a bit and would be interested in your experiences.
Thanks!
Alexander
The duct is not to separate fan from cooler, but to make sure the hot air doesn't cycle back into the fan, so it's essentially that kind of thing you usually had in those old ATX tower cases with a duct attached to the perforation on the side panel.
@SaperPL have you seen this case? Any thoughts on it?
I like your case's Dual USB-A more than Type-A x1 & Type-C x1.
I also dont really see the point of front panel audio jacks in these ITX cases.
Why don't more cases mount the GPU so its fans are on the same side of the case as the CPU cooler?
Console | Sliger
Sliger Designs is a manufacturing company based in the United States specializing in computer cases and systems.www.sliger.com
I've seen it, there is a review made by OptimumTech and according to that review, the Sentry has still better thermals (mostly for the GPU) even with all that shenanigans with perforations at the back and, if i understand correctly, with those fans installed.
This case is nice and has really nice finish, especially I like how they made the bends on the panels at the back, that's a nice touch there.
But this case is what ends up happening when you try to do something differently and follow requests from the community without fully understanding the consequences or going with them regardless because you want to sell. A lot of people are sending us random mail with suggestion to change layout in Sentry to have GPU facing the same side as the CPU cooler. Here we can see exactly what happens when you do this.
If you were to put the GPU above the motherboard, then the riser would need to go under/behind the board and you would waste space for it limiting cooler height on CPU and also you would waste space for additional riser bends from the back of the case to the center of card PCB. But when you do it as they did, you don't want to have inverted layout with heavy GPU hanging on the bracket and the riser's slot, so you keep it that way. Now the GPU is warming up the bottom of the case and a lot of that heat is going up to the motherboard compartment and affects CPU cooling.
Second thing is that, for some reason, the PSU is oriented this way its exhaust is facing GPU and therefore the heat from GPU will go to the PSU until it's fan will kick in and start pushing hot air on the tail end of the card. And that fan right behind the GPU core, that could do the most to help cool down the card, is blocked there and will blow cool air (or suck hot air) all around the place except for the chip solder area and memory dies at the back of the card.
Apart from that, as you can see, there is literally a lot of space wasted even around such big card as that strix they have on photos, look at how much of space there is under the card for the sake of fitting the card connector with riser's end. And all that wasted space is spread around the card meaning you can't use it to mount additional 2.5" drives and also all that space works against your GPU cooling - the cooler cannot force the hot air to escape directly through perforation if there is a lot of free space around so it starts mixing the air around and recycling it. Air will flow where there's least resistance. That is the core issue that the inlet in our cover is solving/mitigating. If you can't have induced airflow with big fans around the GPU, you should strive to have exhaust of the hot air as tight as possible or you have to duct the intake to separate fresh air from the outside - but for a GPU that means having custom duct for each card, so it's not doable from the perspective of case manufacturer to handle all potential card cooler layouts.
It's not that this case is bad. It seems like a good "idiot-proof" product, because there's less restrictions on the GPU size which is generally the most complicated part here due to not heaving standardised measurements for cards, but it does all that things about the layout and cooling differently to be better at cooling and in the end it fails to do better, then what's the point of having so much bigger case?
Most of the full length non-blower style, the so-called open-air style cards are made in a way that that some portion of the radiator is directed at the back/the pci bracket while rest of the radiator fins are directed sideways. The exception seems to be with short ITX sized cards where whole radiator has either fins directed front to back of the card, towards the pci bracket like for example R9/Vega Nano and gigabyte mini cards, or cheaper extruded aluminium radiator with fins directed radially outside of the fan.Ah, that's interesting. Yeah, now that you mention it, non-blower fan gpu coolers dont exhaust towards the pcie slot huh? Most if it is directed away from the pcie slot right? The upside of having both fans pulling air in from the same side of the case would make it easier to lay the case flat though wouldnt it? Interesting "dilemma"
I like your 2.5" drive mount also seems like a good design.
As for the PSU, I didnt notice they mount it "rotated 180*" compared to yours. Yeah that seems silly for the reasons you mentioned.