There are a few tests by der8uer and Hardware Unboxed, that show its only really relevant in some games = a few more FPS.From everything I have read including actual benchmarks by pros the faster RAM means little if anything in real world performance, at least on games, maybe some on production work....
I tested Samsung DDR5 4800, then ran it at 5400, then tested some Ripjaws CL32 at 6000 then at 6400, not a bit of difference in any test worth noting.
The article I read that had the most testing I think they went as far as 7400, nothing gained to consider.
Seems buying the fastest RAM is like buying the fastest car but not really knowing what to do with it(most do not and should not try)
And it still heavily depends on timings and the RAM (quality) itself. Faster = better? That only is up to 6000 MHz, and mostly relevant with AMD. Above the numbers even got worse (at least in the IRL tests).
Edit: JayzTwoCents does a nice comparison.
Cant seem to find the one by der8uer, but it was just a sub-element in a bigger test of something entirely else, where he got extremely fast-timed but "slow on MHz" RAM vs. 7200 MHz "fast" RAM and that shows .. mostly its not worth it to buy fast-frequency RAM (6000+) but better timings (CL30) still make a difference.
Thus I ordered DDR 5 5600 with slightly better than normal CL timings.
cu, w0lf.
Last edited: