• Save 15% on ALL SFF Network merch, until Dec 31st! Use code SFF2024 at checkout. Click here!

Prebuilt [SFFn] ASRock's DeskMini A300 - Finally!

ssouthall6

Trash Compacter
Jun 18, 2020
50
18
Ouch. @Valantar hat also some good guesses.

Overall I think it's safe to say, unfortunately, you have a case of RMA

You were quite right my friend. Replacement arrived today and everything is running perfectly. Thanks for the assistance, also thanks @Valantar

64gb running nicely, idling a little high, although it is warm here in the UK right now for once, so may look at changing the wraith that came with the 3200g for a noctua LP cooler - haven't seen tests so will ponder that for now on my working a300. Thanks again guys
 

micky1067

Chassis Packer
Jun 4, 2020
19
19
Did you activate the SR-IOV support? (UEFI -> advanced -> Northbrridge configuration) and the IOMMU ? (UEFI -> advanced amd cbs -> northbridge common objects - northbridge configuraion)
However I don't know wether the APU can be used in this way. (watch this https://lunar.computer/posts/gpu-passthrough-proxmox-60/)

Yes I have.. But no chance...

I have a other idea.. But I don't know if this will work.

Maybe to use a converter from M2.2 slot to mini Pcie and use a second Graphic card in this slot.
So will be nice to use the better one for passthrough in Proxmox for a VM.
 

gustav

Cable-Tie Ninja
Jun 18, 2020
193
90
@ssouthall6 just curious about your RAM. :) May I ask, which freq and voltage? XMP&Stock?

@micky1067 if you follow the guide, suchende has shared, can you post some lspci output or tell where you encounter problems?
 
Last edited:

rubicoin

Cable-Tie Ninja
Jan 12, 2020
164
104
64gb running nicely, idling a little high, although it is warm here in the UK right now for once, so may look at changing the wraith that came with the 3200g for a noctua LP cooler - haven't seen tests so will ponder that for now on my working a300. Thanks again guys

if you want increased cooling performance see my noctua chromax mod (14 mm stock nf-a9x14 pwm @ nh-l9a-am4 -> 25 mm nf-a9 pwn) posted in this thread back in january/february. because of the 2200g it made not much of a difference in temps (still waiting for a decent renoir apu), but helped me lowering fan speed even further.

for the ram modules i came up with a super cheap 0,5 mm alu heat spreading option (0.7$ / piece from aliexpress):



ok, not a real cooling solution, but may help a bit when upping voltages. or may look cool when painted full black or put the g.skill stickers on it from the ram chips or something.
 
Last edited:

ConsolidatedResults

Average Stuffer
May 4, 2019
66
72
[...]
give me a suggestion : the ram i've choosen ( ballistix 3200 cl 16 ) seems difficult to find, right now. amazon doesnt have a vaild delivery date and i dont want to wait too long. i've found a gskill 3000 mhz cl18 ram module. would be a noticeable performance hit or the loss is not so marked?
[...]

Get the plain Crucial 3200 RAM. Nominally CL 22, dual rank modules for me run 3200 CL18 @ 1.2V or 3333 CL16 @ 1.35V on a 2400G

It does, but there are also limits to the maximum stable memory speeds, dependent on both the CPU/APU (memory controller), motherboard design, and the memory ICs. My setup refuses to be stable above DDR4-2933 no matter what, despite the memory being nominally rated for 3200 (and using timings from 1usmus' DRAM calculator doesn't help whatsoever). It seems to work, and memtest and the like gives no errors, but I get random shutdowns if I try to run the memory at 3200. Zen (1) and Zen+ are much the same in this regard, with Zen 2 being much improved. Of course, all currently available APUs are Zen or Zen+. So, to sum up, especially with pre-Zen 2: YMMV.
I have no xp using 3400G, but Internet states it's memory controller is also specd for 2933 MHz. Sorry, you will have to try it out or wait untill someone replys who has actually tried it out already :)
Try it out using 3200. If it's unstable, enable SOC Overclock Flag - if you don't mind about +0.1V. Otherwise use "fault-safe" 2933MHz.

One needs to verify SOC Overclock VID actually having an effect, whether the setting does something at all depends on the BIOS version and whether configured RAM speed exceeds SPD rating (at least for non-XMP modules). Check post #640 in this thread:

 
  • Like
Reactions: rubicoin

Valantar

Shrink Ray Wielder
Jan 20, 2018
2,201
2,225
One needs to verify SOC Overclock VID actually having an effect, whether the setting does something at all depends on the BIOS version and whether configured RAM speed exceeds SPD rating (at least for non-XMP modules). Check post #640 in this thread:

I wasn't talking about the A300 specifically but pre-Zen 2 Ryzen generally - the limitations to memory clock speeds are universal, but obviously dependent on the characteristics of each implementation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubicoin

ConsolidatedResults

Average Stuffer
May 4, 2019
66
72
I wasn't talking about the A300 specifically but pre-Zen 2 Ryzen generally - the limitations to memory clock speeds are universal, but obviously dependent on the characteristics of each implementation.

Completely understood, where you wrote that Memtest gives no errors but you still get random shutdowns that in my experience can relate to SOC Voltage being too low or dropping under load, as @gustav also observed, so i wanted to suggest to check that - when you try to run your RAM at 3200 and you set SOC Voltage to offset the voltage drop to help it becoming stable - the SOC voltage setting actually does stick. Because it could be that you set it to e.g. supply 1.15V but it actually only supplies 1V. That is all assuming that "my setup" refers to an A300 based platform. That was all :)

Edit: changed "1.5V" to "1.15V"
 
Last edited:

Valantar

Shrink Ray Wielder
Jan 20, 2018
2,201
2,225
Completely understood, where you wrote that Memtest gives no errors but you still get random shutdowns that in my experience can relate to SOC Voltage being too low or dropping under load, as @gustav also observed, so i wanted to suggest to check that - when you try to run your RAM at 3200 and you set SOC Voltage to offset the voltage drop to help it becoming stable - the SOC voltage setting actually does stick. Because it could be that you set it to e.g. supply 1.5V but it actually only supplies 1V. That is all assuming that "my setup" refers to an A300 based platform. That was all :)
That might be worth a try, but since I'm running a 1600X any voltage changes for the CPU would set the CPU into "OC mode", disabling boost and generally making it act like a mid-2000s CPU, which I'm not keen on. It's a good thing they've changed how this works in later revisions. For now it's actually been stable for as long as I can remember, so I'm sticking with current settings until I can upgrade again later this year or early next year, and relegate the 1600X to NAS duties (at DDR4-2400 or 2666 for stability, obviously).
 

gustav

Cable-Tie Ninja
Jun 18, 2020
193
90
One needs to verify SOC Overclock VID actually having an effect, whether the setting does something at all depends on the BIOS version and whether configured RAM speed exceeds SPD rating (at least for non-XMP modules).

@ConsolidatedResults hello :) well, my conclusion ist that the mobo was not *in the first place* designed to run RAM at 3200.

I'm on 3.60 BIOS.

SOC Overclock Flag is just "a click", to set to 1.1V. you can also manually set the VID (will have to look up) value.

We, well, at least I do speak about modules with XMP profile for their 300/3200 speeds. The same values can be ofc entered manually, if A300 boots. I do not blame at this point. It's just how it goes.

FYI: The XMP profile @2933+ is also outside JEDEC specs - the institution which is designing DDR RAM :) it's just manifested as XMP, but is tested outside of specs. So yeah

Edit: do not supply more than 1.2V to your SOC, as more can permanently degrade performance

also I encourage everyone to try UNIGINE Valley out and HWInfo32 and observe the SOC voltage drop and just post your min value. And just provide shortly your config. We can do a survey and figure it out.

Like this:

3.60bios/3200@CL18@1.2Vram/2400G/1.1Vsoc/0.984Vatdrop/gdr=off/cr=1t

Gear Down Mode = Off (stressing SOC!)
Command Rate = 1T

My stable:

3.60/3200@CL16@1.2V/2400G/VID=41/1.034V/off/1t

TODO: Search up VID offset table for A300, which describes voltages. Higher VID = lower Voltage. Values 45 to 41 were tried by me. Considered safe, since under 1.2V. (VID=41 is around 1.125-1.13V, HWInfo32. it may still differ from real Voltage which comes on the PIN of the SOC vs reported by sensor!)

It should at least give us a picture. UNIGINE is not the payload/test to run. You can run anything. Just observe :) we just need like 20 samples. Draw a graph and find a sweet spot, where we can say anything further. If you do instability, you may increase the voltage and make one more sample, so we could even compare:) Just an idea

Because it could be that you set it to e.g. supply 1.5V but it actually only supplies 1V.
Maybe I do get it wrong. But if you set 1.5V it should supply 1.5V on idle. But when there is power required for computation, the chip draws it from the supply (12V,5V,3.3V,1.8V,... Power rails on your Mainboard). The supply has to keep up with the demand. There comes in such a phenomenon as 'voltage drop' :) The supply cannot satisfy the demand.
 
Last edited:

ConsolidatedResults

Average Stuffer
May 4, 2019
66
72
@ConsolidatedResults hello :) well, my conclusion ist that the mobo was not *in the first place* designed to run RAM at 3200.

I'm on 3.60 BIOS.

SOC Overclock Flag is just "a click", to set to 1.1V. you can also manually set the VID (will have to look up) value.

We, well, at least I do speak about modules with XMP profile for their 300/3200 speeds. The same values can be ofc entered manually, if A300 boots. I do not blame at this point. It's just how it goes.

FYI: The XMP profile @2933+ is also outside JEDEC specs - the institution which is designing DDR RAM :) it's just manifested as XMP, but is tested outside of specs. So yeah

Edit: do not supply more than 1.2V to your SOC, as more can permanently degrade performance

also I encourage everyone to try UNIGINE Valley out and HWInfo32 and observe the SOC voltage drop and just post your min value. And just provide shortly your config. We can do a survey and figure it out.

Like this:

3.60bios/3200@CL18@1.2Vram/2400G/1.1Vsoc/0.984Vatdrop/gdr=off/cr=1t

Gear Down Mode = Off (stressing SOC!)
Command Rate = 1T

My stable:

3.60/3200@CL16@1.2V/2400G/VID=41/1.034V/off/1t

TODO: Search up VID offset table for A300, which describes voltages. Higher VID = lower Voltage. Values 45 to 41 were tried by me. Considered safe, since under 1.2V. (VID=41 is around 1.125-1.13V, HWInfo32. it may still differ from real Voltage which comes on the PIN of the SOC vs reported by sensor!)

It should at least give us a picture. UNIGINE is not the payload/test to run. You can run anything. Just observe :) we just need like 20 samples. Draw a graph and find a sweet spot, where we can say anything further. If you do instability, you may increase the voltage and make one more sample, so we could even compare:) Just an idea


Maybe I do get it wrong. But if you set 1.5V it should supply 1.5V on idle. But when there is power required for computation, the chip draws it from the supply (12V,5V,3.3V,1.8V,... Power rails on your Mainboard). The supply has to keep up with the demand. There comes in such a phenomenon as 'voltage drop' :) The supply cannot satisfy the demand.

Starting from the back, the vdroop issue on the SOC rail is known for the A300 and has been confirmed several times in this thread, so your observations are of course correct.

What further happens with the A300 is that the board may set SOC Voltage to 1.1V automatically or ignore manually set vSOC. The information on how the board behaves for different BIOS versions is in post 640 and can easily be confirmed with a monitoring tool like hwinfo. 1.5V was a typo, meant 1.15V, don't try to run SOC at 1.5V :)

None of the Gen 1/1+ Ryzen G officially support more than DDR2933 anyway, so board support may be secondary. I had Single Rank x16 RAM stable at 3466 with a 2200G on A300, why its not stable beyond that could be anything really. What is definitely bottom of the barrel is the DRAM power solution on the board.

What you are seeing in terms of timings appears to me to be at the upper limits of what you can expect at only 1.2V DIMM ans such low SOC voltage.

The full VID table as such:

5F = 0.95625V
5E = 0.96250V
5D = 0.96875V
5C = 0.97500V
5B = 0.98125V
5A = 0.98750V
59 = 0.99375V
58 = 1.00000V
57 = 1.00625V
56 = 1.01250V
55 = 1.01875V
54 = 1.02500V
53 = 1.03125V
52 = 1.03750V
51 = 1.04375V
50 = 1.05000V
4F = 1.05625V
4E = 1.06250V
4D = 1.06875V
4C = 1.07500V
4B = 1.08125V
4A = 1.08750V
49 = 1.09375V
48 = 1.10000V
47 = 1.10625V
46 = 1.11250V
45 = 1.11875V
44 = 1.12500V
43 = 1.13125V
42 = 1.13750V
41 = 1.14375V
40 = 1.15000V
3F = 1.15625V
3E = 1.16250V
3D = 1.16875V
3C = 1.17500V
3B = 1.18125V
3A = 1.18750V
39 = 1.19375V
38 = 1.20000V
37 = 1.20625V
36 = 1.21250V
35 = 1.21875V
34 = 1.22500V
33 = 1.23125V
32 = 1.23750V
31 = 1.24375V
30 = 1.25000V
2F = 1.25625V
2E = 1.26250V
2D = 1.26875V
2C = 1.27500V
2B = 1.28125V
2A = 1.28750V
29 = 1.29375V
28 = 1.30000V
 

micky1067

Chassis Packer
Jun 4, 2020
19
19
@ssouthall6 just curious about your RAM. :) May I ask, which freq and voltage? XMP&Stock?

@micky1067 if you follow the guide, suchende has shared, can you post some lspci output or tell where you encounter problems?

Hi gustav,

Result.. The VM does niot start. And the proxmox system hangup.
I have done this:

sudo lspci -nnk | grep "VGA\|Audio"

04:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Picasso [1002:15d8] (rev c8)
04:00.1 Audio device [0403]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Raven/Raven2/Fenghuang HDMI/DP Audio Controller [1002:15de]
Subsystem: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Raven/Raven2/Fenghuang HDMI/DP Audio Controller [1002:15de]
04:00.6 Audio device [0403]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 17h (Models 10h-1fh) HD Audio Controller [1022:15e3]
Subsystem: ASRock Incorporation Family 17h (Models 10h-1fh) HD Audio Controller [1849:2233]

Graphic: 1002:15d8
Audio: 1002:15de

/etc/modules-load.d/vfio.conf

vfio
vfio_iommu_type1
vfio_pci
vfio_virqfd


/etc/modprobe.d/vfio.conf

options vfio-pci ids=1002:15d8,1002:15de

update-initramfs

sudo update-initramfs -u -k all

sudo nano /etc/default/grub

update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.4.44-1-pve
Running hook script 'zz-pve-efiboot'..
Re-executing '/etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-pve-efiboot' in new private mount namespace..
No /etc/kernel/pve-efiboot-uuids found, skipping ESP sync.
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.4.41-1-pve
Running hook script 'zz-pve-efiboot'..
Re-executing '/etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-pve-efiboot' in new private mount namespace..
No /etc/kernel/pve-efiboot-uuids found, skipping ESP sync.
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.3.18-3-pve
Running hook script 'zz-pve-efiboot'..
Re-executing '/etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-pve-efiboot' in new private mount namespace..
No /etc/kernel/pve-efiboot-uuids found, skipping ESP sync.


sudo nano /etc/default/grub

GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet amd_iommu=on"

sudo update-grub

Linux-Abbild gefunden: /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.44-1-pve
initrd-Abbild gefunden: /boot/initrd.img-5.4.44-1-pve
Linux-Abbild gefunden: /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.41-1-pve
initrd-Abbild gefunden: /boot/initrd.img-5.4.41-1-pve
Linux-Abbild gefunden: /boot/vmlinuz-5.3.18-3-pve
initrd-Abbild gefunden: /boot/initrd.img-5.3.18-3-pve
Adding boot menu entry for EFI firmware configuration

sudo reboot

In Proxmox VM Linux Mint

Hardware:
BIOS: OVMF
machine: q35
PCi Device: 0000:04:00.0 / All functions, primary Gpu, Rom Bar and PCIe is on.
 

gustav

Cable-Tie Ninja
Jun 18, 2020
193
90
Thank you for your responce @ConsolidatedResults! It brings me a bit up-to-date!

Starting from the back, the vdroop issue on the SOC rail is known for the A300 and has been confirmed several times in this thread, so your observations are of course correct.
Yea, I used to follow this thread and @ShamedGod's results on his memory OC. I may have missed it, thank you for letting me know :)

What further happens with the A300 is that the board may set SOC Voltage to 1.1V automatically or ignore manually set vSOC.
Ok, it was not clear to me, that the board has such a weird behaviour. There you see again, ASRock & their dev team. So awful. Hence I can not emphasize enough. Give us a stable, production BIOS. And not glued together and forgotten about.

On BIOS 3.60, it gave me 1.1Vsoc with: RAM=XMP, SOC OVERCLOCK = Enabled. No further values changed.

I had Single Rank x16 RAM stable at 3466
That's actually pretty neat. Do you remember your voltages? Just curious. I had in mind, that a VID=41 is not that high! But, it's still ok.

In my case: VID=41 == 1.14375V ; HWInfo/Sensor reads "only" 1.125V. But it's 1.14..V what is deliviered.

None of the Gen 1/1+ Ryzen G officially support more than DDR2933 anyway
I disagree on that. As Ryzen was released, (I'm talking about Zen 1/ Zen1+,Raven Ridge), AMD had it officially running at 2933MHz, and after some time, they've updated their statement but the specs were never changed. As far as I know. AMD Page, Raven Ridge Specs - still 2933MHz; Anandtech, Ryzen 2400G, Review
My statement was in regard of the A300 mobo. Like if ASRock saw, Ryzen is officially up to 2933MHz - ok, we build up to 2933MHz - and that's the problem. The A300 has no head room for limits. Like it's on stock running on limits, hence the problems with RAM above "official".

I also agree on RAM power supply XD It's really not dynamic. And thank you very much for the VID Table!
 
Last edited:

gustav

Cable-Tie Ninja
Jun 18, 2020
193
90
Hi gustav,

Result.. The VM does niot start. And the proxmox system hangup.
I have done this:

sudo lspci -nnk | grep "VGA\|Audio"

04:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Picasso [1002:15d8] (rev c8)
04:00.1 Audio device [0403]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Raven/Raven2/Fenghuang HDMI/DP Audio Controller [1002:15de]
Subsystem: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Raven/Raven2/Fenghuang HDMI/DP Audio Controller [1002:15de]
04:00.6 Audio device [0403]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD] Family 17h (Models 10h-1fh) HD Audio Controller [1022:15e3]
Subsystem: ASRock Incorporation Family 17h (Models 10h-1fh) HD Audio Controller [1849:2233]

Graphic: 1002:15d8
Audio: 1002:15de

/etc/modules-load.d/vfio.conf

vfio
vfio_iommu_type1
vfio_pci
vfio_virqfd


/etc/modprobe.d/vfio.conf

options vfio-pci ids=1002:15d8,1002:15de

update-initramfs

sudo update-initramfs -u -k all

sudo nano /etc/default/grub

update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.4.44-1-pve
Running hook script 'zz-pve-efiboot'..
Re-executing '/etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-pve-efiboot' in new private mount namespace..
No /etc/kernel/pve-efiboot-uuids found, skipping ESP sync.
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.4.41-1-pve
Running hook script 'zz-pve-efiboot'..
Re-executing '/etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-pve-efiboot' in new private mount namespace..
No /etc/kernel/pve-efiboot-uuids found, skipping ESP sync.
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.3.18-3-pve
Running hook script 'zz-pve-efiboot'..
Re-executing '/etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-pve-efiboot' in new private mount namespace..
No /etc/kernel/pve-efiboot-uuids found, skipping ESP sync.


sudo nano /etc/default/grub

GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet amd_iommu=on"

sudo update-grub

Linux-Abbild gefunden: /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.44-1-pve
initrd-Abbild gefunden: /boot/initrd.img-5.4.44-1-pve
Linux-Abbild gefunden: /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.41-1-pve
initrd-Abbild gefunden: /boot/initrd.img-5.4.41-1-pve
Linux-Abbild gefunden: /boot/vmlinuz-5.3.18-3-pve
initrd-Abbild gefunden: /boot/initrd.img-5.3.18-3-pve
Adding boot menu entry for EFI firmware configuration

sudo reboot

In Proxmox VM Linux Mint

Hardware:
BIOS: OVMF
machine: q35
PCi Device: 0000:04:00.0 / All functions, primary Gpu, Rom Bar and PCIe is on.

@micky1067
Ok, those are the steps in the guide.

So the problem is: The targeted VM does not start? (Which should have the GPU pass-through)
At which point does Proxmox hang up itself? After starting the targeted VM?
How do you measure that it hangs? Other VMs become unresponsive? no ssh into proxmox possible?

Can you execute lsmod on proxmox to see, wheather your vfio_... modules have been successfully loaded? As a first step of troubleshooting.
If they are loaded into kernel. I assume proxmox hangs directly after you start targetet VM?

Bash:
sudo lsmod | grep vfio

If the output of the command is empty, they have not been loaded. Else, could you please post the output.
 
Last edited:

micky1067

Chassis Packer
Jun 4, 2020
19
19
@micky1067
Ok, those are the steps in the guide.

So the problem is: The targeted VM does not start? (Which should have the GPU pass-through)
At which point does Proxmox hang up itself? After starting the targeted VM?
How do you measure that it hangs? Other VMs become unresponsive? no ssh into proxmox possible?

Can you execute lsmod on proxmox to see, wheather your vfio_... modules have been successfully loaded? As a first step of troubleshooting.
If they are loaded into kernel. I assume proxmox hangs directly after you start targetet VM?

Bash:
sudo lsmod | grep vfio

If the output of the command is empty, they have not been loaded. Else, could you please post the output.

Hello gustav,
I stoped now to manage gpu passthrough. My whole Proxmox system was broken. I must reinstall it. I think the problem is the integrated gpu.
I think it will be better to have a second graphic card inside. Is a pitty... :(

To you questions. All vfio modules running. And Proxmox hangup when I start a VM with the changes in hardware.
So i can not do something. Only I can go with ssh inside the host system to reboot the machine.
But one time ist was so extrem, that I need to reinstall the whole system.
I become a grub error. Fix minimal bash like line editing .. I can not rescue grub. Really much work.
My luck.. I had a backup of my lxc containers and VM...
 

sta999

Efficiency Noob
Jun 29, 2020
5
0
Hello to all deskmini lovers, new to forum but reading you offen,
i'm writing from Greece and i would appreciate your help to my problem.

I have the a300 running fluently for 9 months with m.2 nvme adata xpg 6000, 3400g, hyper x 2x8gb 2933, stock cooler from 3200g,

i was playing games with no problems but suddenly when i load not a heavy game for example rise of the tomb raider the system crashes (restarts), memtest crashes, burnintest on 3d crashes....i've tried 3400g on another mobo with no problem, i tried on deskmini the 3200g and crucial 2666 2x8gb ram the same crashes, in all bios's in other ssd fresh win10 install, same crashes. I have also noticed an temp increase inside the case on idle too and the environment temp is the same, the heatsinks on cpu cooler and mobo burn allover, is that normal?

I've sent it to the vendor and the first answer was "the deskmini is not for games but only for office work" (made me furious) anyway after the check they said that it passes with no errors. I requested to make a more thorough test and explained that crashes on 3d and i 'm waiting.

Please can anyone tell me if there is a way to see if the deskmini has the problem or if it can be fixed any how?

And finally i'm about to buy a noctua fan as my last effort, what do you suggest the l9i or l9a?

Thank you in advance, and sorry for my english.
 

ShamedGod

Cable-Tie Ninja
Apr 21, 2019
147
77
Asrock just released a Beta BIOS for the A300, updates to AGESA Combo-AM4 1.0.0.4 Patch B.
I was waiting for a new BIOS to be released before the 07JUL20 XT CPU launch, as I was hoping that would also be when the new APU's would be officially announced (or at least be unveiled), however this BIOS is specifically targeting "gamers, overclocking lovers and PC enthusiasts" So I'm confused.

I'm going to D/L it and try it out but will be really sad if this in a BIOS "unlocking features" for the A300 as a Swan Song before ASRock EOL's the A300 :(

EDIT: So far I have crashed the A300 several times trying to run benchmarks and stress tests in an hour. Have yet to get through 3DMARK Night Raid... Believe them when they say BETA.

EDIT2: Set the RAM to XMP Profile and it completed the benchmark.

EDIT3: Defaulted the BIOS and set the RAM to the XMP Profile... It gave me errors in MEMTEST and crashed the system watching YouTube videos. DDR4-3400 settings settings at 1.35V set to auto everything gave MEMTEST Errors. SO I went to DDR4-3333 Auto everything, No errors at over 1000% runtime. Tightened the Primarry timings to 18-20-20-20-40 and it still passed MEMTEST no problem. So I may try to tighten the timings more but it's really odd that the machine HATES the XMP profile of the RAM and will not run DDR4-34000 speed now with full auto timings. It may trained poorly but if I remember right DDR4-3400 was borderline so I'll stick to DDR4-3333.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GLSRacer

ShamedGod

Cable-Tie Ninja
Apr 21, 2019
147
77
Hello to all deskmini lovers, new to forum but reading you offen,
i'm writing from Greece and i would appreciate your help to my problem.

I have the a300 running fluently for 9 months with m.2 nvme adata xpg 6000, 3400g, hyper x 2x8gb 2933, stock cooler from 3200g,

i was playing games with no problems but suddenly when i load not a heavy game for example rise of the tomb raider the system crashes (restarts), memtest crashes, burnintest on 3d crashes....i've tried 3400g on another mobo with no problem, i tried on deskmini the 3200g and crucial 2666 2x8gb ram the same crashes, in all bios's in other ssd fresh win10 install, same crashes. I have also noticed an temp increase inside the case on idle too and the environment temp is the same, the heatsinks on cpu cooler and mobo burn allover, is that normal?

I've sent it to the vendor and the first answer was "the deskmini is not for games but only for office work" (made me furious) anyway after the check they said that it passes with no errors. I requested to make a more thorough test and explained that crashes on 3d and i 'm waiting.

Please can anyone tell me if there is a way to see if the deskmini has the problem or if it can be fixed any how?

And finally i'm about to buy a noctua fan as my last effort, what do you suggest the l9i or l9a?

Thank you in advance, and sorry for my english.


I mean, their not wrong... I have had issues with my 3400G giving me a BSOD or freezing while Watching a YouTube video or streaming Netflix\Hulu and playing a "light" GPU intensive game like PAC-MAN 256. The Noctua is 100% the way to go. If it was available when I went to purchase mine I would have gotten the CHOMAX NH-L9a.