PPL - Performance Per Liter, Round 2!

[Duality92]

General rules and entery rules

• Picture of actual PC
• Volume calculated with exterior dimensions of case WITH power brick(s)
• Cinebench R15 must be run on CPU benchmark and screenshot must be taken with CPU-Z open on the first tab.
• Time Spy on default preset and score is Graphics score, not total score.
• Time Spy must have results page screen shot, GPU-Z first tab and link to result posted.
• Round 2 PPL calculation ((CineBench R15 score * Time Spy graphics score)/(Build Volume^1.5))/100
• This is a friendly competition, keep it clean and civil
• Competition ends at 25 entries (new round with new benches starts after)

| Time Spy download link | Cinebench download link |


​

Leaderboard (PPL - Username - CPU - GPU - (CBR15*TimeSpyGFX)/Volume - Post #
1. 17322 - Gautam - i9 7960x - GTX 1080 ti - (3994*9630)/(7.9^1.5) - Post #10
2. 15585 - VELKASE Michael - R7 1700 - GTX 1080 - (1660*7511)/(4.0^1.5) - Post #14
3. 11345 - petricor - i7 8700k - GTX 1080 - (1605*7903)/(5.0^1.5) - Post #8
4. 10864 - AURMEND - i7 9700k - GTX 1080 ti - (1451*9317)/(5.37^1.5) - Post #21
5. 6796 - GermanDrifter97 - R7 1700 - GTX 1080 - (1562*7545)/(6.7^1.5) - Post #11
6. 6706 - TroyMSLprod - i7 8700k - GTX 1070 - (1596*5960)/(5.86^1.5)/100 - Post #7
7. 6011 - Nanook - i9 9900k - RTX 2080 - (1934*11032)/(10.8^1.5) - Post #20
8. 5204 - rfarmer - i7 8700k - GTX 1070 - (1405*6423)/(6.7^1.5) - Post #4
9. 4708 - K888D - i7 8700k - GTX 1080 ti - (1476*10086)/(10.0^1.5) - Post #9
10. 4706 - Majestic - R7 1700 - Vega 56 - (1407*6287)/(7.07^1.5) - Post #5
11. 3691 - Wyd4 - i7 8700k - GTX 1080 ti - (1564*10554)/(12.6^1.5) - Post #17
12. 1590 - Duality92 - i5 8600k - GTX 1070 - (959*5559)/(10.4^1.5) - Post #3
13. 708 - Duality92 - i5 7300U ES - Intel HD Graphics 620 - (362*391)/(0.63^1,5) - Post #2
14. 279 - confusis - Pentium G4560 - GTX 750 ti - (299*1137)/(5.3^1.5) - Post #6

Top CPU score : Gautam - 3994 - i9 7960x
Top GPU score : Nanook - 11032 - RTX 2080
Lowest volume : Duality92 - 0.63 - ECS Liva Z Plus


Unofficlal, not valided.
[15523 - neygurt - i9 9900k - GTX 1080 ti - (1963*10200)/(5.5^1.5) - Post #29]
[13272 - AURMEND - i7 9700k - GTX 1080 ti - (1608*10271)/(5.37^1.5) - Post #21]

Top CPU score : Will populate when we reach 10 entries​

Top GPU score : Will populate when we reach 10 entries
Lowest volume : Will populate when we reach 10 entries

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Round 1 thread

Round 1 top three!

Leaderboard (PPL - Username - CPU - GPU - (CPUZMT*Heaven)/Volume - Post

1. 7179 - Gautam - i9 7960X - GTX 1080 Ti - (11537*4916)/7.9 - Post #232
2. 3732 - Arie - i9 7980XE - GTX 1080 Ti - (9776*4390)/11.5 - Post #133
3. 3381 - petricor - i7 8700k - GTX 1080 - (4349*3887)/5.0 - Post #186

 

[Duality92]

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/28463207

(362*391)/(0.63^1.5)=70777

70777 - Duality92 - i5 7300U ES - Intel HD Graphics 620 - (362*391)/(0.63^1.5) - Post #2

Pictures : https://www.overclock.net/forum/18088-hardware-reviews-program/1631024-ocn-labs-ecs-liva-z-plus.html

 

[Duality92]

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/28473419

(959*5559)/(10.4^1.5)=158952

158952 - Duality92 - 8600K - GTX 1070 - (959*5559)/(10.4^1.5) - Post #3

 

[rfarmer]

Ok figured I better post before the i9s show up and blow me out of the water.

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/4368571

520358 - rfarmer - i7 8700k - GTX 1070 - (1405*6423)/(6.7^1.5) - Post #4

 

[Majestic]

470553 - Majestic - AMD Ryzen 1700 - Vega 56 Nano - (1407*6287)/(7.07^1.5) - Post #5

PPL = 470553

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/28476663

I haven't undervolted my GPU or overclocked my CPU so I probably have a bit more power I can squeeze out my build.

EDIT: So after I did all that work to submit I noticed my 3DMark said my RAM was clocked at 2200 instead of 3200! We all know how much Ryzen loves fast RAM so I fixed it in my bios and re-ran tests. @Duality92 @rfarmer

 

[confusis]

((299* 1137)/(5.3^1.5))/100
(339963/12.2)/100
27865.82/100
278.66.. ouch




(no pics of rig until case review is up.. shhh)

 

[TroyMSLprod]

Back again for round 2 with the same setup from round 1.

6708 - TroyMSLprod - i7 8700k - GTX 1070 - (1596*5960)/(5.86^1.5)/100 - Post #7

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/28517305

 

[petricor]

My line:

11345 - petricor - i7 8700k - GTX 1080 - (1605*7903)/(5.0^1.5)/100 - Post #8
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/28619570

Same setup as in round one, with a bit of tweaking to the OC settings- interestingly I got a notable GPU performance increase by trading off a few MHz of core speed against a significantly faster ram clock...

 

[K888D]

My first attempt at doing anything like this after a "crash" course in some light overclocking:

4708 - K888D - i7 8700K - GTX 1080Ti - (1476*10086)/(10.0^1.5)/100 - Post #9
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/28630147

Setup also showing Cinebench score and CPU-Z:

Screenshot of 3DMark and CPU-Z:

 

[Gautam]

17322 - Gautam - i9 7960x - GTX 1080ti -(3994*9630)/(7.9^1.5)/100 - Post #10

Switched to quiet GPU fans, so no OC on it this time.

https://www.3dmark.com/spy/4275636

 

[GermanDrifter97]

Better late than never, here is my little monster:

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/29833873

((1562 * 7545) / (6.7 ^1.5)) / 100 = 6795

 

[rfarmer]

Very nice @GermanDrifter97, is the Silverstone PSU new or did you have that before?

 

[GermanDrifter97]

Very nice @GermanDrifter97, is the Silverstone PSU new or did you have that before?

That is the one that was in my PC from the beginning. The SX800-LTI, 800W modular SFX-L PSU

 

[VELKASE Michael]

15585 - VELKASE Michael - R7 1700 - GTX 1080 - (1660*7511)/(4.0^1.5)/100 - Post #14
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/29926198

Still accepting submissions? Here's my little computer box in the corner.

 

[GermanDrifter97]

15585 - VELKASE Michael - R7 1700 - GTX 1080 - (1660*7511)/(4.0^1.5)/100 - Post #14
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/29926198

Still accepting submissions? Here's my little computer box in the corner.

Your case looks cool, what is that?

 

[VELKASE Michael]

Your case looks cool, what is that?

I can't tell yet
This case will be released with full details next month.

 

[Wyd4]

The case size is killing me haha.

((1564 * 10554)/(12.6^1.5))/100 = 3690.608867

 

[GermanDrifter97]

I can't tell yet
This case will be released with full details next month.

Damn I look forward to it

 

[fandango]

Hi; I'm not going to officially enter because I actually don't have dx12 so I can't run Time Spy (I can't stand windows 10, so I installed 7). I recently got an ASRock 1080 so I thought I'd post. I'm fairly sure it's the best power per liter right now, no question. I double checked what my composite score would be, and it's easily around 16500-17500. The way you're scoring makes it so when you have a 2.7 liter case + a .4 liter power supply, it just doesn't seem sporting.

I've been building small systems for a long time, it's a hobby of mine. I set up my deskmini with a 1080, and I paired it with an 8700 (non-k). Given that I got just barely over 1400 on cinebench, going by petricor's scores which are just slightly higher than mine, I'd guess I'd get slightly over 6800 on Time Spy. But my case is only 2.7 liters with a .4 liter power supply, for a total volume of 3.1 liters, and 3.1^1.5 rounds up to 5.5.

So conservatively, this machine would get over 16500 for a total score. 6800*1400/ (3.1^1.5) /100 = 17441. Even if you figure it at .5 liters for the power supply for 3.2 liters total (it comes out to .402 liter for the power brick), it's still over 16500.

Here's a screenshot of the 3dmark graphics results page. I didn't overclock anything, never do.

The deskmini has been perfect so far, it's my favorite system I've ever had.

You people seem cool, cheers

 

[Nanook]

6011 - Nanook - i9 9900k - RTX 2080 - (1934*11032)/(10.8^1.5) - Post #20
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/30963023