Due to the obscene load times of our initial ZOTAC 1080 Mini review, our original interactive/dynamic graphing program has been sacked. The review that once took a pathetic 23 seconds to load should now load in an impressive ~2 seconds.
As a disclaimer to all members of our community, no other information from the review has been changed but I did take the opportunity to fix a few graphing mistakes that I had made by including 'maximum framerates' instead of 'minimum framerates' (derp).
For complete transparency, here is what was altered during this optimization process:
- All of the dynamic graphs have been painstakingly replaced with static .PNGs.
- All 'maximum framerates' have been replaced with the values for 'minimum framerates'.
I apologize for any inconvenience that the the longer-then-normal load times may have caused and I hope that you with find the review, as well as the included measurements, to be a valuable resource.
You can see the review here:
https://smallformfactor.net/reviews/zotac-1080-mini-review
Odd benchmark results though. I seemed to notice a small bump in my Firestrike and Timespy results over yours. Did you provide the GPU scores alone or the entire system score? for reference: my stock 1080/7700k scored 6733 in Timespy and 17605 in Firestrike accordingly. Could it just be the score bump i get from having the 7700k? probably.... either way, thanks for providing some more benchmarks! I'll certainly now have to download Heaven and Valley and try those out on my system and update the benchmarks portion of my Build thread.
