confusis
John Morrison. Founder and Team Leader of SFF.N
Original poster
SFF Network
SFF Workshop
SFFn Staff
Yeah... headrooms are important...A lot smaller! Between tests, the heatsink was barely warm to the touch. You'd want to have some cooling headroom though - in case something decides to lock up and throw the CPU a 100% load!
And it's also under 60mm height total... I hope someone in these forums could test this. :xThe scythe Big Shuriken does have some decent surface area, but it's advantage may be the low restriction under the heatsink enabling horizontal layout of the board, much like the L12.
You killed it in this last test!? ;_;If i hadn't killed the Thermal test board ( -_- )
What's the reasoning behind this ? Because metals can be plated or even painted, so I'm not sure what the reason is.As such, optimal heatsinks for passive cooling are large, preferably dark in color
would it be conceivable to cool a 200W GPU passively ?
It seems the heatsink you've used here might blur the test results a bit. It's top face is nearly quadratical, so the difference between airflow from the front or the side is going to be low, and the hole in the middle could allow for some kind of continuous airflow to form.
I did a similar test with some Arctic Cooling tower cooler and a 45W CPU, and that got up to 81°C under 100% load in horizontal orientation and started throttling. In vertical, it was at 72°C. Didn't test sidewards vs. frontwards airflow, though.
What's the reasoning behind this ? Because metals can be plated or even painted, so I'm not sure what the reason is.
I'm curious about the topic of passive cooling, some questions that I can think of:
- how much heatsink surface area would you need per 10W of heat ? (considering adequate heatpipes)
- would it be conceivable to cool a 200W GPU passively ?
- how much "airflow" does passive cooling generate at ~60°C with 20°C ambient ?
- what are the best performance per watt components for a completely passive gaming PC ?