- Jul 19, 2015
- 818
- 1,359
Frank from Pico Box who designs these boards in his spare time is very keen to work with the SFF community
Perhaps suggest to them they get a rep / someone on this forum?
Frank from Pico Box who designs these boards in his spare time is very keen to work with the SFF community
Looking good! Really curious how far this board can be pushed.
They seemed very receptive to your 0 connector proposal so you might just get your way
What length cables do you think should be included by default? The 45cm cables included with the HDPlex are ridiculously long considering the cases they are likely to be used in. I wouldn't think anything over 30cm would be needed.
I am thinking using 20-25cm softer 24PIN cable in the next batch. 45cm is indeed a little bit too long even for my H5 case and there is always ATX extension cable if needed...
How about the length for other cable?
I am planing to change the ATX cable/8PIN cable to this type for next batch.
That's because it's power level is over 9000!The Nano is a noisy card because it CAN'T CONTAIN ALL THAT RAW POWERRRRRRRRRRR
That's because it's power level is over 9000!
Two of them are, so its power level is more in the range of 4600That's because it's power level is over 9000!
How is testing going? Are you only testing using a stable load or are there plans for actual test with systems? Or is that meant for @michaelmitchell to check out?
Also no need for a heatsink with a 300W load? That would have some crazy efficiency then.
Nice study Michael.
To have competition between hdplex, pico box and even mini box could be benefic for sff.
However to handle R9 nano(see my signature), based on my experience they will need to produce :
R9 nano is the first type of card with top end gpu (fidji) using hbm, where it's easy to have shorter pcb. The true successor will be vega/pascal using hbm2.
- Dc-dc adapter that does not coil whine like hell (just conected to hdplex 250w to r9 nano nothing else)
- Handle power requirement from r9 nano as my system is always crashing with hdplex only connected to r9 nano
Another competitor to power sff could be also atx cable extension with an sfx power supply ( like sf600)...it's not taking that much place especially compared to voodoo 350w or dual power brick.
So I can compare with both the Voodoo 350W and the meanwell ERP-350-24.
I'm curious, the current design looks very much like the HDPlex in terms of layout, as is the intention. But has there been any attempt to make the R9 Nano less of a problem child with these types of DC-DC boards or is it more like the HDPlex 250W?
What are the differences in terms of component choices and their values.
What are the differences in terms of component choices and their values.