@BRSxIgnition @robojim Since this has come up several times, I will look into making a simple survey so we can see accurate numbers. I think what we all agree here is that there is a balance between two options that needs harmony. Also, please take note that this rear IO plate is specifically designed to be removable. Making a new plate with updated cable geometries and options becomes more straight forward. Wherever we choose that is balance lands on, know that there is always room for improvement.Thanks for the reply! I think this is definitely an improvement compared to an all-covered design, and I get you want things to look nice, but I still believe it is causing more issues than it is solving.
If you simply had a passthrough window at the back like the Meshlicious and SV540, you'd be able to cover all scenarios, and only those constantly unplugging and replugging items to the back of the case (the minority) would be affected.
The only item I'd have a port for at the back is power, the rest should be fine to work through motherboard and front IO, in my opinion. Anything more just introduces points of failure and ports that become obselete as technology improves.
This isn't a laptop that's constantly being plugged into new displays/devices. For most, a device that is 20L and this weight remains stationary on a desk.
TL;DR: IMO, you should save yourself and everyone the headache and costs and leave the back gap fully open with an AC Cable extention only.
Thanks again for this feedback!