This is geared towards enthusiasts who will have a video card by default. This is the not the motherboard you are looking for. I am almost considering selling off my ASRock board because. Then again, X470 and B450 is rumored to be coming in February with the 12-nm+ Zen Refresh. It might be worthwhile waiting until then if you are able since the new chipset may have more goodies than the last.not even HDMI???
https://smallformfactor.net/forum/threads/asus-strix-b350i-gaming.3417/https://www.tweaktown.com/news/59371/asus-rog-strix-mini-itx-motherboard-ryzen-teased/index.html
Giggity Giggity, lets hope asus addressed the VRM's better than the competition.
I own a Fatal1ty AB350 Gaming-ITX/ac and it does not support power on from USB, only wake from sleep from USB, so that is unfortunately not true. :/yes ........wake from sleep plus power on from KB -mouse on ALL my asrock boards............
I registered just to vent my frustration but man all AM4 Mini-ITX offerings have issues right now! (I'm sure many of these already have been discussed)
Gigabyte AB350N: bad layout of power connector and SATA2 ports that block airflow.
Biostar X370GTN: RAM slots too close to the CPU + no displayport 1.2 (4K@60Hz)
Asrock AB350: no USB3.1 and no displayport 1.2
My dream AM4 Mini-ITX would have the basic layout of the Asrock, the Biostar USB ports and the Gigabyte video ports. If nothing better comes along I guess I'll settle for the Asrock, but man it is somewhat disappointing.
I'm happy to explain why I said this.
The lack of wifi and bluetooth is undeniable. At the time of posting, this board does not have this functionality according to the Biostar website. As for build quality, for one, the Gigabyte and the ASRock boards both have metal reinforcement of the PCIe slots. You can see this without looking at a spec sheet, because the metal is exposed. Is this reinforcement necessary? That is debatable, but it is an example of superior build quality.
I don't deny that the Biostar board is capable, I just can't find a reason to recommend a board that costs the same as the ASRock offering but has less functionality and less attention to detail. If you can think of a good reason, I'd be glad to put it on the list.
EDIT: forgot to add, see here for proof of reinforced PCIe slots (link 1, link 2). Gigabyte board also has LEDs for $5 more than the Biostar one, so again, more bang for buck.
Gigabyte AB350N: bad layout of power connector and SATA2 ports that block airflow.
Asrock AB350: no USB3.1