Normal
According to TPU's GPU database there's just 15% between a 1660 and a 1660 Ti already, so there really isn't much room for the Super (unless there's also a Ti Super?). They might just kill off the Ti - that's what happened with the previous Super launch, at least. If they can sell salvaged chips at higher performance through sacrificing a bit of power efficiency by boosting clocks, that gives them more inventory of fully enabled chips to sell as Quadros at much higher margins.I'm hopeful for AMD doing well in the <75W segment with RDNA - the rumored 128-bit bus on these cards is a good fit for LP SKUs at least, so even if these are 100-120W SKUs there's always the possibility of a downclocked LP version (or a balls-to-the-wall one with some sort of external power, though that would be quite the squeeze).
According to TPU's GPU database there's just 15% between a 1660 and a 1660 Ti already, so there really isn't much room for the Super (unless there's also a Ti Super?). They might just kill off the Ti - that's what happened with the previous Super launch, at least. If they can sell salvaged chips at higher performance through sacrificing a bit of power efficiency by boosting clocks, that gives them more inventory of fully enabled chips to sell as Quadros at much higher margins.
I'm hopeful for AMD doing well in the <75W segment with RDNA - the rumored 128-bit bus on these cards is a good fit for LP SKUs at least, so even if these are 100-120W SKUs there's always the possibility of a downclocked LP version (or a balls-to-the-wall one with some sort of external power, though that would be quite the squeeze).
