This is where eGPU dies. I have been wrecking my brain to come up with a good solution for a portable and affordable eGPU but seriously at the cost and size of the current solutions... this machine will be just better for that plain and simple. http://www.mini-itx.com/~M100-60W and ... oh god if it ends up in a Thin ITX board... or an NUC even.
I don't think eGPU and portable will ever be synonymous anyway it's just not feasible or practical. I have mine setup essentially as a docking station for my laptop - more ports and GPU horsepower when I'm home, unplug a single plug and I'm mobile again.
Most people aren't stuck with a $1800 Thinkpad without a good dGPU though, there are plenty of laptops with good keyboard configurations out there with better dGPU than a 940MX for under $1000, so yes he is a special case. You guys are being such sticklers for details my point wasn't this deep it's just about what makes financial sense.
My point is even low end ultra portable eGPU aren't going to be cheap because they'll be extremely low volume, and they won't be upgradable unless they use MXM which is going to be even more expensive. I'm speaking from experience when I say it doesn't make sense to get a low end or midrange eGPU, light gaming can easily be handled by a modern iGPU for the rare times you need to game on the go.
I'd also like to mention the drawbacks of eGPU's currently and issues it has with TB3, it seems like everyone has a misunderstanding of how they work because it's not as simple as plug and play to get a full desktop GPU. You're going to take a 20% performance hit if you're using your internal laptop display on top of 5-10% decrease depending on the PCIe lanes available to your Thunderbolt 3 port.
I get the point that it isn't going to be cheap, that's why I'm saying it's worth $300-400 to me for a eGPU w/1050 ti. I'm also aware that there is a 20% performance hit, that's still making it perform far better than integrated graphics. Not everyone needs an eGPU only for gaming, and for many of us who do game a low end eGPU still makes more sense than a high end because of power consumption and size concerns. I'm also aware that the eGPU isn't "upgradeable" in that i cannot replace the GPU inside the enclosure, but I can replace the whole unit in 3 years with another one.
I just bought a 13 inch ultrabook with integrated graphics, If I wanted a built in discrete GPU I need to upgrade to a 15.6 inch version which adds $300-$400 price, and doubles the weight but does not improve CPU, RAM, or SSD. For the GPU upgrade, it only gives me an MX150 graphics. A $300-400 TB3 powered GTX 1050 is going to outperform that MX150, and I always have the option of not using it when I don't think I'll need it - which means i'm carrying around a more portable notebook and getting better battery life than I would have with the 15.6 version. I get that the TB3 eGPU has drawbackjs, but it is still the best solution for anyone with a sub 14inch notebook right now.
If someone can make a GTX 1070 TB3 enclosure for $400 (or even $500) that is as small as the Acer Graphics Dock, then I would agree that a low end eGPU stops making sense at $400.
Last edited: