Recent content by DaveMan20

  1. D

    Production Sliger SM550/560/570/580 (2 and 3 slot riser layouts, with air and liquid cooling variants)

    Me too. Mine was $10 less and I can't see the adapter in the order.
  2. D

    Production Sliger SM550/560/570/580 (2 and 3 slot riser layouts, with air and liquid cooling variants)

    Has anyone been able to fit a 120 radiator in the Sm560? If so, could you please provide photos and which CPU and what temperatures? Apologies if this has been answered before.
  3. D

    Production Sliger SM550/560/570/580 (2 and 3 slot riser layouts, with air and liquid cooling variants)

    @ermac318 For me the big difference is the ability to have a AIO and a window as well as having improved airflow with top to bottom fans. The M1 is not an option for those interested in having and AIO and showing off their internals. If the old 580 was to become the 570 that would solve my issue :D
  4. D

    Production Sliger SM550/560/570/580 (2 and 3 slot riser layouts, with air and liquid cooling variants)

    @KSliger Really sad to see the 580 changed. I was super excited for a case for the new wider GPUs and an AIO CPU. I just don't agree that many people who were after the 580 will be fine with the 570. A lot of us have/are intending to have wider GPUs. Also, there are a few cases now that support...
  5. D

    Production Sliger SM550/560/570/580 (2 and 3 slot riser layouts, with air and liquid cooling variants)

    Just found this thread after giving up on the Dan C4. That case is going nowhere and constant design arguments just send the design in circles. This case is amazing @KSliger, I will be definitely grtting an SM580. Love the concept of having multiple designs.
  6. D

    DAN C4-SFX - old

    For all those who are sick of waiting as we seem to be going in loops. The slinger SM570 or SM580 should meet everyone's needs. https://smallformfactor.net/forum/threads/the-sliger-sm550-560-570-580-2-and-3-slot-riser-layouts-with-air-and-liquid-cooling-variants.6789/
  7. D

    DAN C4-SFX - old

    @dondan I think you should just go with the current design for either the C4 or A4 layout, whichever you decide. There has been to many proposed changes and people are already starting to lose interest. I would just stick with the current design, whilst implementing the survey results and stick...
  8. D

    DAN C4-SFX - old

    @dondan I couldn't agree more with blindphleb. Please do a poll for A4 vs C4 layout. I assume a larger number of people want to have a window for the motherboard, with the GPU on the opposite side for fresh air. Further to this, If you change your design to the alternate one in the survey it...
  9. D

    DAN C4-SFX - old

    @dondan If you want to know what your community wants from this case then PLEASE make a poll/vote. I feel we a constantly going in circles as the voices of a few keep throwing this build off track. You could easily find out everything you need to know about what your community wants with a poll...
  10. D

    DAN C4-SFX - old

    The S1 has shown that that a 240 rad with dual chamber is definitely possible (noting that I like this case way more than the S1).
  11. D

    DAN C4-SFX - old

    @dondan Looking forward to the survey/poll for the A4 layout. It seems the majority of the community prefer the A4 layout, but it would be interesting to see the poll results. I can't pass up on the A4 layout simply because I could have a glass panel and also a vented panel for the GPU.
  12. D

    DAN C4-SFX - old

    Thanks @dondan for the explanation. That makes sense. It would definitely be an interesting case concept but personally I am super excited for the single 240 layout.
  13. D

    DAN C4-SFX - old

    @dondan Just weighing in on the dual 240 rad option even though I know this will not be the design you are going with. I can't see how increasing the amount of radiator space without increasing the number of fans will result in better cooling. If you have 2 240 rads and only 2 fans you will get...
  14. D

    DAN C4-SFX - old

    I imagine the case will still be flip-able (the top panel would flip to the bottom side if you were to flip it). As far as i am aware, there has never been an iteration that suggested removing the flip-able feature.