Another idea:
Geekbench 6 Multi Core * 3DMark Steel Nomad / Volume mm3
Reasons:
1. Simple
2. No 1.5 power problem
3. Latest and cross platform benchmarks
4. My and petricor’s results are almost equal (40-42)
I think I know the best formula for Round 5
((CineBench R23 score * Time Spy graphics score)/(Build Volume^1.175))/100 😂
In this case, my ultra-small build produces the same result as Petrichor's ultra-powerful build. Both approaches will be equal at the beginning of the round
I think he meant (Volume in cm)^1.5 instead of (Volume in liters)^1.5 in original formula. In this case my result is 8635, guryhwa's is 6056, much closer to each other. Because Sub-1 numbers to the power of 1.5 have some anomaly
Important for what? To get a worse results? I prefer better 😀
PS: maybe it can be helpful for somebody. Here you can download 3D model files of my custom EM780 panels
Oh yes, the rating is unfair because @petricor is not in the first place 😀
It's a joke. To put it seriously, the rating is really unfair cause we have performance ^ 2 (performance*performance) in the numerator and volume ^ 1.5 in the denominator. So, performance has more weight than volume. The...
Surprisingly very quiet and completely silent when idle. I think it's due to liquid metal.
Watch this and this videos for more info about noise.
Only replaced the top and bottom panels
Stock vs Custom:
Yes, I got rid of the active SSD heatsink
Any usb-c chargers, that I tried, works well -...
The new size is 0.198L (80x80x31)
The new PPL score is (12775 * 2688) / ((0.198 + 0.053) ^ 1.5) / 100 = 2,730,735
The first revision 1 of the 3D panels here:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.