Normal
Thanks for the information.Then... because Claim 10 refers to two panels + bezel and it only requires gpu + motherboard to be paralell (no mention of being on the same plane) you could target a much, MUCH broader set of cases. Maybe even stuff such as the A4, for instance. As it has a bezel that gives rigidity to everything, uses a ribbon, etc.In any case, I see no relation whatsoever with this patent and K888D's design. If anything because his design allows for a fan and in no way has a bezel such as the one described in Claim 10.
Thanks for the information.
Then... because Claim 10 refers to two panels + bezel and it only requires gpu + motherboard to be paralell (no mention of being on the same plane) you could target a much, MUCH broader set of cases. Maybe even stuff such as the A4, for instance. As it has a bezel that gives rigidity to everything, uses a ribbon, etc.
In any case, I see no relation whatsoever with this patent and K888D's design. If anything because his design allows for a fan and in no way has a bezel such as the one described in Claim 10.
