Normal
I didn't know about this thread . This was my message on the lazer3d thread after reading he licenzed a layout fromt Josh.I never said a single word against you and your character and I don't want to follow a discussion in this direction. I only said that I can't believe this patent is valid and will resist a lawsuit if it protects only the hardware layout. I think it is not possible to have a valid patent on a hardware layout.Too bad you didn't say a single word about your patent what it exactly protects and why you think it is a real invention.Here is a good example why I think a pure hardware layout patent will not be valid : If I have a hand full of Lego bricks and now imagine I connected two bricks on a way to each other no one did it before (because there are some many possible combinations) would a patent be valid for it? Keep in mind one rule for having a valid patent is that the invention is not obvious.
I didn't know about this thread . This was my message on the lazer3d thread after reading he licenzed a layout fromt Josh.
I never said a single word against you and your character and I don't want to follow a discussion in this direction. I only said that I can't believe this patent is valid and will resist a lawsuit if it protects only the hardware layout. I think it is not possible to have a valid patent on a hardware layout.
Too bad you didn't say a single word about your patent what it exactly protects and why you think it is a real invention.
Here is a good example why I think a pure hardware layout patent will not be valid : If I have a hand full of Lego bricks and now imagine I connected two bricks on a way to each other no one did it before (because there are some many possible combinations) would a patent be valid for it? Keep in mind one rule for having a valid patent is that the invention is not obvious.
