Reply to thread

Message

Alright, [USER=43]@Josh | NFC[/USER], listen. We got off to a bad start. Maybe I've jumped to conclusions and been overly critical. Maybe my concerns over the possible ramifications of this patent are unwarranted. If so, I apologize.

So can I ask you to help me better understand, and perhaps allay my concerns? Because - and I'm sure I speak for others as well - I'd like to make sure I don't inadvertantly design a case that infringes your patent (or if that's even something I should be concerned about).

Can you answer the following questions for me?
What is it about K888D's design that causes it to fall under your patent?
Does it only cover GPUs that face the same side as the CPU, or both orientations? Because the patent references both.
Would it cover something like the Zaber Sentry, for example?

Please understand - while I'm pretty sure you have no intention to engage in predatory patent litigation (AKA patent trolling), I can't be 100% sure that you will always be the sole owner of the patent, and that it won't become an issue in the future. Better to be safe than sorry.

I hope you understand where I'm coming from.

<blockquote data-quote="Necere" data-source="post: 122332" data-attributes="member: 8">Alright, [USER=43]@Josh | NFC[/USER], listen. We got off to a bad start. Maybe I've jumped to conclusions and been overly critical. Maybe my concerns over the possible ramifications of this patent are unwarranted. If so, I apologize.So can I ask you to help me better understand, and perhaps allay my concerns? Because - and I'm sure I speak for others as well - I'd like to make sure I don't inadvertantly design a case that infringes your patent (or if that's even something I should be concerned about).Can you answer the following questions for me?<ol>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">What is it about K888D's design that causes it to fall under your patent?</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">Does it only cover GPUs that face the same side as the CPU, or both orientations? Because the patent references both.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ol">Would it cover something like the Zaber Sentry, for example?</li>
</ol>Please understand - while I'm pretty sure you have no intention to engage in predatory patent litigation (AKA patent trolling), I can't be 100% sure that you will always be the sole owner of the patent, and that it won't become an issue in the future. Better to be safe than sorry.I hope you understand where I'm coming from.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Necere, post: 122332, member: 8"] Alright, [USER=43]@Josh | NFC[/USER], listen. We got off to a bad start. Maybe I've jumped to conclusions and been overly critical. Maybe my concerns over the possible ramifications of this patent are unwarranted. If so, I apologize. So can I ask you to help me better understand, and perhaps allay my concerns? Because - and I'm sure I speak for others as well - I'd like to make sure I don't inadvertantly design a case that infringes your patent (or if that's even something I should be concerned about). Can you answer the following questions for me? [LIST=1] [*]What is it about K888D's design that causes it to fall under your patent? [*]Does it only cover GPUs that face the same side as the CPU, or both orientations? Because the patent references both. [*]Would it cover something like the Zaber Sentry, for example? [/LIST] Please understand - while I'm pretty sure you have no intention to engage in predatory patent litigation (AKA patent trolling), I can't be 100% sure that you will always be the sole owner of the patent, and that it won't become an issue in the future. Better to be safe than sorry. I hope you understand where I'm coming from. [/QUOTE]

Verification