Normal
Not entirely ASRock's fault but as of two weeks ago major sites were still fooled by the BIOS: https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/asrock-deskmini-a300-pc-barebones,6109-3.html"does allow full DRAM overclocking [...], and offers similar flexibility to the APU’s integrated Radeon RX Vega graphics controller.""Similarly, our graphics processor topped out at 1500 MHz using 1.20V, where 1.25V couldn’t push it to our next-higher 1600 MHz setting."Then, on the next page:"we decided to see what we could do with the APU’s integrated Radeon RX Vega graphics instead. Remember from our firmware description that it topped out at 1500MHz, up 36% from the stock 1100MHz.":sadface:
Not entirely ASRock's fault but as of two weeks ago major sites were still fooled by the BIOS: https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/asrock-deskmini-a300-pc-barebones,6109-3.html
"does allow full DRAM overclocking [...], and offers similar flexibility to the APU’s integrated Radeon RX Vega graphics controller."
"Similarly, our graphics processor topped out at 1500 MHz using 1.20V, where 1.25V couldn’t push it to our next-higher 1600 MHz setting."
Then, on the next page:
"we decided to see what we could do with the APU’s integrated Radeon RX Vega graphics instead. Remember from our firmware description that it topped out at 1500MHz, up 36% from the stock 1100MHz."
:sadface:
