Reply to thread

Message

Thanks for the heads up! New AGESA! I gave this a spin:

OC Screen finally has only working features (SOC Voltage, DRAM Voltage and DRAM timings). How bleak.
Full AMD CBS / PBS Menus are back (were stripped down in P3.40). Yay, I guess?
Fan Control appears still bad, as in the PWM curves for FAN1 and FAN2 seem to not be independent. I though this was fixed in P3.40 so I tried that for comparison but same there. Not sure why I thought there was a BIOS version where fan control was working independently for FAN1 and FAN2?
I have the same performance issues as with AGESA ComboAM4 0.0.7.2 BIOSes (P3.20, P3.40). That is, every single graphics benchmark performs worse than on PinnaclePI 1.0.05 in BIOS P1.20. E.g. Unigine Valley Basic loses as much as 5-10%. I assume memory performance is about as bad in 1.0.0.1 as it was in 0.0.7.2. Couldn't verify as my Aida64 trial has run out.
I reverted to P1.20, at the moment it's still the best performing BIOS for me. Later BIOSes so far do not add any features, so unless you are about to pop a 3000 series APU into the system, I would not install P3.50 or any of the 3.X series BIOSes.

<blockquote data-quote="ConsolidatedResults" data-source="post: 148777" data-attributes="member: 12344">Thanks for the heads up! New AGESA! I gave this a spin:<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">OC Screen finally has only working features (SOC Voltage, DRAM Voltage and DRAM timings). How bleak.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Full AMD CBS / PBS Menus are back (were stripped down in P3.40). Yay, I guess?</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">Fan Control appears still bad, as in the PWM curves for FAN1 and FAN2 seem to not be independent. I though this was fixed in P3.40 so I tried that for comparison but same there. Not sure why I thought there was a BIOS version where fan control was working independently for FAN1 and FAN2?</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">I have the same performance issues as with AGESA ComboAM4 0.0.7.2 BIOSes (P3.20, P3.40). That is, every single graphics benchmark performs worse than on PinnaclePI 1.0.05 in BIOS P1.20. E.g. Unigine Valley Basic loses as much as 5-10%. I assume memory performance is about as bad in 1.0.0.1 as it was in 0.0.7.2. Couldn't verify as my Aida64 trial has run out.</li>
</ul>I reverted to P1.20, at the moment it's still the best performing BIOS for me. Later BIOSes so far do not add any features, so unless you are about to pop a 3000 series APU into the system, I would not install P3.50 or any of the 3.X series BIOSes.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ConsolidatedResults, post: 148777, member: 12344"] Thanks for the heads up! New AGESA! I gave this a spin: [LIST] [*]OC Screen finally has only working features (SOC Voltage, DRAM Voltage and DRAM timings). How bleak. [*]Full AMD CBS / PBS Menus are back (were stripped down in P3.40). Yay, I guess? [*]Fan Control appears still bad, as in the PWM curves for FAN1 and FAN2 seem to not be independent. I though this was fixed in P3.40 so I tried that for comparison but same there. Not sure why I thought there was a BIOS version where fan control was working independently for FAN1 and FAN2? [*]I have the same performance issues as with AGESA ComboAM4 0.0.7.2 BIOSes (P3.20, P3.40). That is, every single graphics benchmark performs worse than on PinnaclePI 1.0.05 in BIOS P1.20. E.g. Unigine Valley Basic loses as much as 5-10%. I assume memory performance is about as bad in 1.0.0.1 as it was in 0.0.7.2. Couldn't verify as my Aida64 trial has run out. [/LIST] I reverted to P1.20, at the moment it's still the best performing BIOS for me. Later BIOSes so far do not add any features, so unless you are about to pop a 3000 series APU into the system, I would not install P3.50 or any of the 3.X series BIOSes. [/QUOTE]

Verification