Normal
I'm actually excited to see you in here and give a response. Some others have posted a similar system, but not in as much detail. I have a bunch of questions for the first scenario:1- What happens when one half of the voting community gets upset when their stance loses? Can they immediately start a new vote, or do we have a minimum time before we repeat the cycle?2- Also, is their an "age" limit or other qualification to vote? What happens when a passionate member, starts creating an army of alts to vote on their stance?3- You mentioned the user should be banned, but what of the topic discussing the actual product? Should backers or owners, curious members, or anyone else not be allowed to post or discuss anything of the project?Personally I do like the alternative idea more.
I'm actually excited to see you in here and give a response. Some others have posted a similar system, but not in as much detail. I have a bunch of questions for the first scenario:
1- What happens when one half of the voting community gets upset when their stance loses? Can they immediately start a new vote, or do we have a minimum time before we repeat the cycle?
2- Also, is their an "age" limit or other qualification to vote? What happens when a passionate member, starts creating an army of alts to vote on their stance?
3- You mentioned the user should be banned, but what of the topic discussing the actual product? Should backers or owners, curious members, or anyone else not be allowed to post or discuss anything of the project?
Personally I do like the alternative idea more.
