Normal
Hmm, too bad the BIOS doesn't allow undervolting, that'd lower temps significantly. For Linux, one thing that you can do to lower temps for day-to-day use is to switch from the default ondemand/schedutil governor to powersave. Phoronix did some testing early on that showed a not-too-bad performance hit for a bunch of use-cases with a significant power savings. When I run my system w/ powersave, it pretty much parks the cores at 1.55GHz w/ no noticeable perf hit when I'm just browsing/typing/etc. Switching governors back to performance or schedutil is a simple cpupower command in the terminal. Not as nice as having Ryzen Master/software OC options, but fingers crossed that'll come in a future kernel update. (Honestly, I'd just like if AMD would publish the BIOS and Kernel Developer's Guide for Ryzen so that CPU lm_sensors support can be added.)BTW, for motherboard sensors, the MSI boards use a Nuvoton chip and can be supported w/ the nct6775 module. Gigabyte boards seem to use it87 modules.
Hmm, too bad the BIOS doesn't allow undervolting, that'd lower temps significantly. For Linux, one thing that you can do to lower temps for day-to-day use is to switch from the default ondemand/schedutil governor to powersave. Phoronix did some testing early on that showed a not-too-bad performance hit for a bunch of use-cases with a significant power savings. When I run my system w/ powersave, it pretty much parks the cores at 1.55GHz w/ no noticeable perf hit when I'm just browsing/typing/etc. Switching governors back to performance or schedutil is a simple cpupower command in the terminal. Not as nice as having Ryzen Master/software OC options, but fingers crossed that'll come in a future kernel update. (Honestly, I'd just like if AMD would publish the BIOS and Kernel Developer's Guide for Ryzen so that CPU lm_sensors support can be added.)
BTW, for motherboard sensors, the MSI boards use a Nuvoton chip and can be supported w/ the nct6775 module. Gigabyte boards seem to use it87 modules.
