Production FormD T1 Classic (READ FIRST POST)

Increase volume from 9.8L to 10.5L to support MSI Suprim X 30XX?

  • Yes, worth the trade off to be more compatible with components

    Votes: 116 24.7%
  • No, not worth it b/c it is not better than the ROG 30XX, which fits now at <10L

    Votes: 353 75.3%

  • Total voters
    469

OdinsPlayground

Efficiency Noob
Sep 4, 2020
7
8
Any status update on the December 1-4 Batch? Last we heard there was 40% left of this batch. Has more orders been dispatched? Will they continue to do so, or are we waiting until the production resumes with a new manufacturer before more of these orders are filled?
 

Mao_Setzer

Trash Compacter
Jul 10, 2019
37
71
Hi All, I have a small question.
Is it possible in 3 slot mode, to put the riser bracket in 2 slot mode, and if yes how ? I remember seeing that somewhere but Im not sure if I imagined it....
 

eedev

Cable-Tie Ninja
Apr 23, 2020
155
291
Hi All, I have a small question.
Is it possible in 3 slot mode, to put the riser bracket in 2 slot mode, and if yes how ? I remember seeing that somewhere but Im not sure if I imagined it....
Yes :)

 

biopunk

Airflow Optimizer
Sep 24, 2020
248
359
@NinoPecorino that thread predates T1 2.0 announcement.
One of more recent statements:
We are planning to upgrade to PCIe 4.0 Riser around 2021Q2 Next year.
2.0 is planned for April, April is technically 2021Q2. So should we expect a 4.0 riser in T1 2.0?
 

textkiller

Minimal Tinkerer
New User
Dec 16, 2020
3
1
What are the additional expected changes for V2.0 over V1.1 compared to what you already listed? I think that'd affect some people's decision on whether to stick with V1.1 or wait for V2.0.
FormD email:
1. Support for taller (140mm) and longer (320mm) GPUs, like the Asus ROG Strix Nvidia 30XX and AMD 6X00/XT

2. Support for 2.5 and 2.75-slot GPU spacing, for more options on space allocation between the CPU/Motherboard and GPU

3. Support for an optional Vertical Stand Kit (v2 exclusive), to allow T1 to sit vertically on a desk

4. Simplification of various design elements to optimize for electrophoresis
——

I hope T1 2.0 have a little more space for a watercooled radiator but W360 said its outer dimention will not be changed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrHudacris

Asuka4Laifu

Chassis Packer
Dec 12, 2020
18
41
I'm not wahaha but the P1 has support for bigger rads while only being slightly larger. Maybe look into waiting for that (nobody knows when it will release, safe to assume it's not coming before v2.0) or consider another bigger case if bigger rads are really that important.
 

catzooka

Efficiency Noob
Feb 1, 2019
5
3
@textkiller, thank you for re-sharing the changes from the e-mail, but I intended to ask what changes were planned beyond that list, since @Wahaha360 was saying that he wouldn't chose V1.1 over V2.0. Maybe the better question: what features of V2.0 should make us consider cancelling a pending V1.1 order and wait for V2.0?
 

Freshfrenchfries

Chassis Packer
Aug 13, 2019
16
37
@textkiller, thank you for re-sharing the changes from the e-mail, but I intended to ask what changes were planned beyond that list, since @Wahaha360 was saying that he wouldn't chose V1.1 over V2.0. Maybe the better question: what features of V2.0 should make us consider cancelling a pending V1.1 order and wait for V2.0?
I would also like to know the answer to @catzooka's question, considering @Wahaha360 said, "there is no way I would personally choose V1.1 over V2.0, and I'm only half way done with the changes." The 2nd part of that quote is especially concerning if the V2.0 really is so close on the horizon given the updated timeline.

If we're happy with V1.1 part compatibility, don't want to use the vertical stand, and don't need 2.5/2.75-slot modes, what other V2.0 feature could make me resent the decision to keep my order after switching from gunmetal to titanium V1.1?
 

Wahaha360

a.k.a W360
Original poster
SFFLAB
NCASE
SSUPD
Feb 23, 2015
2,131
10,697
@textkiller, thank you for re-sharing the changes from the e-mail, but I intended to ask what changes were planned beyond that list, since @Wahaha360 was saying that he wouldn't chose V1.1 over V2.0. Maybe the better question: what features of V2.0 should make us consider cancelling a pending V1.1 order and wait for V2.0?
I would also like to know the answer to @catzooka's question, considering @Wahaha360 said, "there is no way I would personally choose V1.1 over V2.0, and I'm only half way done with the changes." The 2nd part of that quote is especially concerning if the V2.0 really is so close on the horizon given the updated timeline.

If we're happy with V1.1 part compatibility, don't want to use the vertical stand, and don't need 2.5/2.75-slot modes, what other V2.0 feature could make me resent the decision to keep my order after switching from gunmetal to titanium V1.1?

Just wait and see.
 

AP2

Airflow Optimizer
Feb 1, 2017
291
325
Has anyone used the koolance HX-CU720V? I have don’t feel like taking apart the loop.

wonder it performs better than the tx240.
 

tinyitx

Shrink Ray Wielder
Jan 25, 2018
2,279
2,338
it's a 30mm thick rad with 30FPI, it should outperform the TX240 by a lot
Koolance HX-CU720V's 360mm version is HX-CU1020V which beats EX360 (whose 35mm is thicker than TX240's 20.5mm even though the fpi is 18 vs 22).

So, yes, it is quite safe to say HX-CU720V beats TX240 easily.