As far as I know there is only 2 Thin boards for AMD before. ECS A78F2-TI and Gigabyte M9M3XAI. Very rare ones. Designed for Intel coolers : )
These aren't AM4 but the info might help.
The central idea here is to have a direct input mobo + m.2 SSD + Ryzen 2400GE (35w) + the lowest profile heatsink possible (NH-L9a?), all inside the M350!
I might consider it IF I can find a good/reliable comparison betwen 2400GE and V1000 (or any other embedded APU).You might consider the AMD V1000 APU motherboards, just by chance I came across the one below. Has a 4-pin connector on the IO side.
Axiomtek GMB140 - 12V input
http://gaming.axiomtek.com/products_info.html?sn=38
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/sapphire-amd-ryzen-v1000-apu,37408.htmlI might consider it IF I can find a good/reliable comparison betwen 2400GE and V1000 (or any other embedded APU).
Features i wanna see compared:
- power consumption
- thermal dissipation
- power input vs performance output (cTDP or anything similar)
The boost clocks and base clocks on the V1807B are lower by around 0.1GHz for boost and 0.25GHz for base compared to the 2400G, mostly to accomodate the 35-54 watt TDP. Expect more successful cooling with the V1807B than the 2400G given the same cooler.
Power consumption should be rather similar, considering similar clocks and similar physical features. I would estimate a power consumption of around 63 watts under load.
What might be of concern is GPU frequency, as on the V1807B, GPU frequency is at (max) 1300MHz. I'm pretty sure it's the same on the 2400G, but if we see power throttling, that may be a problem.
Hopefully this answers a few of your questions... I myself am pretty confused...
It's fine, I understand where you're coming fromI don't wanna sound harsh or anything, but do you have any source for those assumptions? I've searched online a lot for those ccomparisons, but have no success at all and the link you gave here talks solely about the specs (info that can be found everywhere).
TL;DR:
My assumptions were mostly based on TDP being lower and lowered clocks meaning lowered power consumption.
Hopefully this explains my thought process well enough...
(EDIT: Evidently I wasn't thinking properly when I estimated power consumption at 63W, that's based off of TDP, a measure of heat! Either way, power consumption characteristics should be similar to a 2400G, and considering (probably) the inability to overclock the V1000-series processors, they will stay low compared to an overclocked (and better performing) 2400G).