Recent content by papsicleboy

Ah yes because the a4 can cool a 9900k with ease! You missed the point of their comment, obviously they are ok with the increased size of A4 vs C4 or else they wouldn't be interested in the first place, it's that exploring different sizes as you say actually seems to go against the "mission...

@dondan ive been following this case for a long time, it should be understandably frustrating when you basically scrap the design every few months or so. The reason I am vocal about my concerns is because I was so enthralled by the original design. of course sff is about *reasonable* compromise...

Whether or not the ratio has merit is kind of the pivotal point of the discussion, no? What's the point of adhering to or trying to get close to the ratio if it doesn't look good to begin with?

To solve this, could you make the case a bit taller to make cable routing even easier? No more than 3-5mm. to me, taller >>>>> wider. Also I am still of the belief that 2 slot is perfectly adequate in this type of SFF enclosure. With people being interested in mATX support now, maybe the...

Where can I see the full results of the last poll?

@dondan Yes, a lot of hardware products have features that I don't need but pay for anyways. But it makes me not want to buy the product. For example, Dell xps 13 only has a touch screen on the 4k model. I want touch screen but actually would rather not have 4k because of battery life. It's a...

I like the idea of an extrememely flexible case but I don't understand why I should have to pay extra for features that very few percent of people will use (3 slot compatibility). From what I understand there is some kind of expensive power connector needed as well to keep the case closer to...

a 240mm radiator for your cpu in a <11L case is too much of a compromise for you? I don't understand what your ideal setup is. If its a 240mm radiator for cpu and gpu, why not just get a Ghost S1 with 2 tophats, or even a cerberus? Honestly at that point doesn't an NZXT H200i kind of fit the...

@dondan are the renders done yet? :)

It seems like those are relatively small fixes. Hopefully a new prototype will be on the way soon.

just read about 25 pages of thread lol, got worried a bit when the tower design and dual passive radiator design got brought up. I was so completely sold on the original design and I'm really happy to see that it is back! @dondan so will the new/old design be top I/O or side?

@dondan 1. absolutely keep the 2x120mm support, its part of what makes this case so desirable the way I see it. It's so low volume yet could have great temps with aio on cpu+gpu. I absolutely plan on doing this and will be very disappointed to see it go just for a couple of screws. 2. usb c for...

I'm pretty sure the design allows for 2.5 slot cards already. honestly though I have my sights set on other cases at the moment despite how much I like the design of the c4. @dondan is seemingly mia so its a mystery when this case will arrive.

@Metroversal I thought push/pull was almost the same as push or pull, and thats with the same size rad. sacrificing rad size would probably be detrimental to the cooling.

@Wahaha360 What purpose does that have in the c4? I'm not versed in custom watercooling but there is 55mm clearance iirc, so what's the point of going so thin?